User talk:Krissmethod

Recent edit to All the Right Reasons
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, All the Right Reasons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  The StormCatcher   (talk)   (contribs)  00:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * On the YG (rapper) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=717396101 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F717396101%7CYG (rapper)%5D%5D Ask for help])

April 2016
THIS IS YOUR ONLY WARNING: Your recent editing history at Caitlyn Jenner and other articles, shows that you have engaged in edit warring. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the one-revert rule (1-RR), which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on any other topical pages (e.g.- abortion, transgender, iraq, and so on) that are also 1-RR within a 24-hour period. BECAUSE THIS ARTICLE IS A 1-RR ARTICLE: Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—even on different pages—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the one-revert rule. 08:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=pa)
08:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Need for edit summaries
Hi, Krissmethod. I have already laid two advisement templates on your user page so I did not want to lay one more template on you. I hope you reply to me. Ping me if you do. My signature is a ping template, which you can copy and paste into a reply here.

It is customary to leave an edit summary with each edit. Brief is fine. Over time you will even pick up some shorthand that some editors use to further condense their edit summaries. The norm is to use edit summaries and it will smooth things out for you going forward.

Going forward, please provide an edit summary on every edit you make. Thank you.

See you around the Wikis. Cheers! 19:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, I'm Meiloorun. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Johnny Rebel (singer)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 23:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to David Duke. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Please read this carefully
Please note that the only reason I haven't sanctioned you is that your last DS alert was over 12 months ago. Doug Weller talk 08:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

White Supremacy edits
Your edits to white supremacy's lead do not seem to be constructive. Moreover, they are not supported by the text of the article. Please do not edit article leads in such a manner.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - American Politics 2
Based on your wholly unsupported edits at white supremacy and David Duke, you seem to have some issue regarding the overlap of white supremacy with Christian ideology. Please stop this disruptive editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * This is a warning that any next edit from this account without attempting to communicate and address the issues that have been raised would result in immediate preventative block. Communication is not optional, especially when there are problematic editing behaviours associated with this account. Thank you for your understanding. Alex ShihTalk 06:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't know how to respond but whatever man just let it go and mind your own business please? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krissmethod (talk • contribs)
 * Your editing is disruptive and counterproductive (basically vandalism). It's not something that should be let go out overlooked. appears to be giving you a final chance to explain yourself and cease the disruption.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Well it's not a big deal dude so just leave it alone and don't interfere with me and leave me alone. I don't care what your problem is. Stop talking to me and drop it both of you, end of discussion.

October 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alex Shih (talk) 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

As you seemingly have no idea what you are doing wrong, and your first ever communication is to respond with hostility, I have no choice but to block this account indefinitely. This is a collaborative project, and if you cannot collaborate with other editors, you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Alex Shih (talk) 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)