User talk:Krissy thomas/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Women of color: The article did not sound neutral when writing about the topic. I felt there was some opinion pieces within the article. One claim about when talking about the feminist movement and the how society was addressing the struggles that women of color faced. In the talk page, there was talk about many grammatical errors and also including more facts and sources. I do think that there was a lot of information that could be added and from what another editor had mentioned, there was no mention of different women of color other than black and chicano women.

Women's studies: I focused more on the citations and the links, to see if they worked. When I clicked on a few of them, they seemed to link to the correct material listed in the article. This article had a lot more factual content than some of the other articles I had read. I do see that there are few places where information is not cited though.

Sexism: This article was one of my favorite as far as informational content. It included everything that could be under or related to "sexism" and there were plenty of links to different articles to further explain things. The way Wikipedia talks about sexism differs from how we talk about it in class because there is only factual information, whereas in class we insert our opinions and feelings into what we write. I would like to see a little more information regarding men and sexism because I believe in our class, yes we do talk about women but we also talk about gender as a whole. Krissy thomas (talk) 05:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)