User talk:Kristianpaul

The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

SHPEGS
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SHPEGS, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.redferret.net/?p=9049. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

The article SHPEGS has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article was a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate. Under that specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article previously deleted after such a debate, it may be deleted again at any time.

For the relevant prior discussion, please see Articles for deletion/SHPEGS. — Satori Son 19:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben NanoNote for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben NanoNote is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ben NanoNote until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 11:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)