User talk:Kristin.T98/sandbox

The article needs to be built out more. I would expand on the significance of the changes throughout the 1st 2nd and 3rd alliances, according to literature on the topics. The outline looks great! The tone is very factual so far, but be careful with questions if history is repeating itself, cause you wanna make sure it's some expert's theory that you can cite. LaurenSkirball (talk) 17:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC) LaurenSkirball

Your article is really well organized, and will have a lot of good information when it is complete. Something I think you can add is a more thorough explanation of what the Concert of Europe was. As someone who doesn't know anything about this topic, the lead paragraph wasn't enough for me to understand what the article would be about. Also, I think it would help if you explain in 1-2 sentences what the purpose of the congresses were in the concert of Europe. Other than that, I think you're off to a really good start!

Something I really liked about this article is the way it is organized, and I realized that I should probably use more titles and subtitles in my article to better organize my thoughts.

Also just curious– there is another wiki page on this topic... do you plan on adding to it? Or creating a new one?S.gowda147 (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Great Use of Citations
I think that the current contents of the article are well-written and serve as a great starting point for future additions. There are plenty of citations that back up the information in the article and the structure/outline flows nicely. Echoing previous comments, the current contents could be flushed out a bit more with background information and implications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristianJT1 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)