User talk:Kristina2222

A tag has been placed on Starfish Public Relations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 23:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No, I'm sorry, I've read your comment on the talkpage but I've still deleted the article. There's not a word in it that isn't blatant advertising. The idea of "rewriting" it—and keeping it meanwhile as a wikipedia article — just won't fly. Feel free to write and post a wholly new article, but there's nothing in the text you posted that's usable for an encyclopedia article. Please refer to the links Mhking has given you, as well as our central policy Neutral point of view. Bishonen | talk 03:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC).