User talk:Kristinatseng/Energy in Benin/Liliananrodriguez Peer Review

Liliana Rodriguez's Peer Review
Peer review

General info

Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)

User:Kristinatseng

Link to draft you're reviewing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kristinatseng/sandbox

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Yes

Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

No

Lead evaluation

The lead presents information about different sources of energy available.

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes

Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Some content is missing

Content evaluation

A couple of sentences should be added under the new headings to show why the headings are important to the article.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?

Yes

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No

Tone and balance evaluation

The tone is neutral and unbiased.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Not sure

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

N/A

Are the sources current?

N/A

Check a few links. Do they work?

N/A

Sources and references evaluation

A source should be added for the new information, such as the information about Power Africa.

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes

Organization evaluation

The information about renewable energy in Benin that is under the heading Access to Electricity could possibly be moved or expanded on under the heading Renewable Energy.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

Yes

What are the strengths of the content added?

I think the addition of Power Africa and West African Gas Pipeline is a great way to expand the article. Additionally, it seems that a lot of research has been done regarding statistics about general access to electricity in Benin.

How can the content added be improved?

Add information under the possible new headings you are planning on creating. There is a Wikipedia article about the West African Gas Pipeline. It seems to have a lot of information. Possibly write a one or two sentence summary under your heading regarding the pipeline. Also, geography and climate could be combined into one heading, as it doesn't seem that there is much information that might be relevant about climate.

Overall evaluation

Overall, the addition of new headings is a good way to expand the article. Don't forget to add sources as you type new information so you don't lose your sources. I think you did a good job adding relevant information about general access to electricity and renewable energy.

Liliananrodriguez (talk) 01:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)