User talk:Kristinatseng/sandbox

Peer review (By Sachiyo Ouchi)
Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) - Kristinatseng Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kristinatseng/sandbox

Lead Guiding questions: Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes. Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, but it seems like it will be expanded. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content Guiding questions: Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes. Is the content added up-to-date? Yes. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes, but it seems like it will be expanded.

Tone and Balance Guiding questions: Is the content added neutral? Yes. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References Guiding questions: Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No citation. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No citation. Are the sources current? No citation. Check a few links. Do they work? No citation.

Organization Guiding questions: Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes. Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No. Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No.

Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No. Are images well-captioned? No image. Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No image. Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No image.

Overall impressions Guiding questions: Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes. What are the strengths of the content added? Great work with a lot of new materials and data. The draft has a list of sections of exhaustive coverage. How can the content added be improved? Keep expanding on the sections that you have listed. Add sources for the information, especially for the data.