User talk:KristoffHunter

Welcome!
Hello, KristoffHunter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! 99.0.80.70 (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2012
Hello, I'm 99.0.80.70. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 99.0.80.70 (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 99.0.80.70. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 99.0.80.70 (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The impression here is that you've not taken the time to read Wikipedia guidelines. While you're welcome to add content that's properly sourced, per WP:RELIABLE, yours appears to be a WP:COI account, given to promotional tone. Please understand that any content you add that isn't referenced, or is non-neutral in tone, will be removed. Thank you, 99.0.80.70 (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.0.80.70 (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * And for purely promotional intent. 99.0.80.70 (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sisler High School. Jprg1966  (talk)  03:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * If you have read about reliable sources, you'll already know that what you're suggesting cannot and will not meet the requirements, and cannot be used; period. As I said though, you already would know that (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * In addition, you say you "have been given approval by him to edit the page" - not the case so far as we are concerned. No principal owns the page for their school. This isn't Facebook, it's an encyclopaedia. And, while we try to help people editing as educational projects, it isn't an exercise book for course work. All editing should comply with our rules. WP:SPAM seems to have been a problem, as does WP:V. Peridon (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)