User talk:Kriswarry

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! DS 12:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

December 2017
Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Field Spaniel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please let me finish the edits!!
I am disabled so slow. Please see the page for wartenbergs migratory sensory neuropathy for my editing. This page is being edoyed with the go ahead of the field spaniel society, and is new content, so there isnt a reference yet! I am an author with over 30 years experince in them whose mother wrote a definitive book on their anatomy Kriswarry (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The issue is that you are adding content without any references. Does the society have web content that you can use as a reference? That would be a valid source, but you can't just place commentary into an article (a reviewed Good Article at that) at the request of others. Please use the talkpage to develop a proposed text and references that can be used in the article. That's what the talkpage is for, it's not appropriate to leave comments in articles.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 *  No, you just linked to the main page of the website. As a published author, I think you understand referencing, even if the Wikipedia format is a bit difficult to master. Is there a specific citation you can provide to support the commentary? Please propose it on the article talkpage, which will allow for discussion and orderly referencing - we can help.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Also, right now you're edit-warring, rather than discussing. I've opened a discussion on the talkpage, please participate there.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

it now has full references, why is it still being deleted as unsubstantiuated?

Speedy deletion nomination of Larger of the Spaniel breeds, with a weight scale up to 40-55 pounds


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Larger of the Spaniel breeds, with a weight scale up to 40-55 pounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 13:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I have contested thanks. The edits now include the references to the Breed Standard from the UK official site where the breed originated. however the editor is still deleting as unsubstantiated - ie he isnt rereading to check I have now complied, please advise?
 * The page only contains an external link. The article is tagged as "... an article that contains no content whatsoever, or consists only of external links, categories [...]", so the tag appears to be relevant. Maybe you added content but did not save it? That can happen. If the article is deleted, you can create it as a draft which will give you more time to work on it. --bonadea contributions talk 14:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Field Spaniel. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Each of the last reverts added the references, but the editor is still deleting it as unsubstantiated despite the edits being fully referenced and within guidelines

''

Please use the talk page. Present your suggested additions or changes there, and wait for people to comment on them instead of editing the article directly. bonadea'' contributions talk 13:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

It is being discussed on the private FSS members group on facebook, I am the messenger. The committee are not IT literate and will not comment here.

Your addition to Field Spaniel has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * You may not copy content that is clearly marked as copyrighted into Wikipedia. Please use references as sources of information, not as copy/paste text.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * It appears that you've been doing the same thing at Wartenberg's migratory sensory neuropathy. If this happens again, you'll be blocked. Don't copy anything into Wikipedia. Editors who introduce copyrighted material into Wikipedia may be indefinitely blocked if it is a recurring behavior.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
 Acroterion   (talk)   03:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

I have legally quoted some scientific texts as per the fair use definitions. you have completely removed all the useful information from the page. I now hold you responsible directly for the pain and suffering others will receive as you have removed all information indiscriminately, and not left anything on the talk page. this is bullying and reprehensible behaviour. I shall no longer support wikipedia, and talk openly about this disrepect to experts on all possible forums. goodbye. Kriswarry (talk) 18:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)