User talk:Kriyame2223

Unspecified source/license for File:Shakti Anand.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shakti Anand.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 08:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shakti Anand.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Shakti Anand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://celebcenter.net/shakti-anand/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sai Deodhar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Date of birth needs to be sourced. Use WP:RSP or WP:ICTF complaint mainstream source next time like Indian Express, Times of India, etc. No StarUnfolded, ClebsWiki, Ganaa.com, Google searches, etc.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sai Deodhar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Do not add unsourced DoB again and again. Find WP:RS source for that. No celebswiki, startunfolded.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)