User talk:Kronos9326

Welcome!
Hello, Kronos9326, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Ellusionist, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Deppty (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ellusionist


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ellusionist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Deppty (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Notability and conflict of interest
Hello. I noticed your comments at Draft talk:Ellusionist. It seems likely that the page and the accompanying draft Draft:Ellusionist is going to be deleted, so I will respond here so that my response isn't lost.

Please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; a general reference guide with articles about topics it defines as notable. In general, for a topic to be deemed notable enough for inclusion, it must have already received significant coverage from multiple sources that are both reliable (having an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight) and independent (having no personal, political or financial interest in the subject). In the case of companies and organizations, these notability criteria have been refined at Notability (organizations and companies). Without the required coverage from third-party sources, the company won't be considered worthy of inclusion. A company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article simply because it exists and wants to have an article. Wikipedia is not a business directory and we don't accept articles simply at the behest of their subjects.

Writing about your own company is a conflict of interest, which is problematic for many reasons. As someone involved with the company, you are not an objective judge of this company's notability. Merely using Wikipedia to tell the world about the company's existence is considered promotional if the company isn't notable. You will also find it difficult to abstain from using your own personal knowledge or experience, which is not allowed. Article content must be paraphrased summaries of material previously published in the aforementioned reliable third-party sources. Finally, you will find it difficult to write from the required neutral point of view, which demands that articles be written in a plainly factual manner without overly positive or negative tone to the wording.

Please also note that writing about the company that employs you makes you a paid editor by Wikipedia's definition. As such, you would have to disclose this information publicly and visibly as described in Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure policy.

In the event that your company were to be considered notable enough for inclusion, you would not have any right of ownership or control over its contents. Wikipedia articles are communal by nature. They are open to editing by anyone at any time, so their content can change - sometimes substantially over time. You would not be able to insist that it remain at a version you prefer. Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, we assume good faith of fellow editors who make changes. Disagreements over content are discussed on the article talk page through a process of civil discussion and compromise, with the goal of achieving consensus. If that fails to resolve the disagreement, further dispute resolution measure may be employed.

I'm sorry that this message was not more favourable. If you're still interested in contributing to Wikipedia, please follow some of the links in the welcome message at the top of this page. You can also ask questions at the help desk or the Teahouse, a forum for new users to engage with experienced Wikipedia editors. Best of luck. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the very lengthy and detailed reply. My intention wasn't to promote the company, but to actually provide details that others has requests, specifically details on history of some of the collectible products. I understand everything that's been said. Perhaps things might change in the future to allow the inclusions of it, but I will look for another place to put this information. Kronos9326 (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)