User talk:Krow750

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Krow750! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:58, Friday, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Krow750! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:00, Friday, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Parivrtta Trikonasana


A tag has been placed on Parivrtta Trikonasana, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Nahal (T) 07:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Utthita Hasta Padangusthasana I


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Utthita Hasta Padangusthasana I requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 08:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Next Millionaire Next Door: Enduring Strategies for Building Wealth
Hello, Krow750,

Thanks for creating The Next Millionaire Next Door: Enduring Strategies for Building Wealth! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Variants of asanas
Hi, and thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of asanas. However, the approach that has been taken on asanas is to provide articles for each major asana, such as Trikonasana, and to describe variants, such as Parivrtta Trikonasana, in a standard 'Variations' section within the main article. This ensures that the article topics are notable, where some variants are very minor and might risk deletion as non-notable if they had their own articles. Also, I note that another editor tagged Parivrtta Trikonasana as a close paraphrase of Yoga the Iyengar Way, meaning that they felt that the choice of wording was close to being a copyright violation, something that Wikipedia is obliged to take extremely seriously. In this case, the main article at Trikonasana already has a Variations section that covers Parivrtta Trikonasana, and indeed illustrates it with the same image that you used. I've therefore redirected it to the main article. Hope this is all clear and comprehensible. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Mottainai
Hi! Sorry to bother you on your talk page, but would you mind reconsidering your !vote? A number of other experienced voices have chimed in since your initial !vote, and it seems likely that given your week-long absence from the project you may not have noticed them. There were also, as I am sure you are aware, two previous consensuses against including the content in question, and it seems unlikely that the community would be willing to accept a simple majority !vote as overruling such a precedent. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 02:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)


 * No, it would be a big mistake to not remove those tags. The point Yuriko Sato is making is indeed the scholarly consensus, and we should respect that, rather than quibble with it through inaccurate tagging. Krow750 (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The point Yuriko Sato is making is indeed the scholarly consensus Do you have evidence for that? It seems like all the scholarly sources disagree with her, while the sources that agree with her are all self-published or non-scholarly sources... BTW, it seems increasingly like you are doing this to push some kind of bad-faith agenda -- you may want to change course. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 01:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Claims about effects of asanas
Hi, many thanks for your contributions to asana articles. However, we need to be extremely circumspect about any claimed benefits, especially where, as in Iyengar's case, no actual evidence was adduced for any of them. In Science of yoga the weak case for such claims (basically, none, with plenty of reliable evidence the other way) is presented, with discussion of the nature and purpose of different types of claim. We really can't present any of these claims in asana articles without extensive caveats, and basically we'll be better off not repeating those caveats over 100 articles, so I suggest we don't add the claims in the first place. To put this at its plainest, Iyengar is a splendid source for Iyengar's asana practice, but totally unreliable for claims of benefits. I do hope this is clear. Happy to discuss. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Same at Virabhadrasana - claims are not substantiated, which means "untrue", so I have reverted your addition there. Please do not continue until we have reached some sort of agreement, I have explained the position and ample evidence is available in the citations at Science of yoga. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Chiswick Chap-Hi, Thank you for your feedback. What I want to point out here is that the claims made about asanas were attributed to a source which in my view is akin to saying, so and so who is an authority, albeit arguably, has said this about the asana. I thought attributing information to a source was an acceptable convention. Having said that,I am quite aware that any unsubstantiated claim about something like yoga might be controversial, but I think when I decided to add the information, it was because many claims were already mentioned in the said article. All I did was add a few more and I made sure to cite it so that the burden of proving it is not on me. I understand and accept that such information should be looked at with care, but I am also curious to know why other claims about those poses have not been flagged. Just curious, not necessarily argumentative.Krow750 (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)


 * There's nothing special about this case. Every scientific or medical claim on Wikipedia has to be supported by a reliable source, and in the case of medical effects that means WP:MEDRS. It requires proof via a systematic review of experimental evidence. The site you mentioned was not of that sort. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to Caged Bird
Hi Krow750,

I've reverted your additions to I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings because they did not fit where you placed them. For example, while your story about Angelou being drunk does belong in the Background section, it doesn't belong at the beginning of that paragraph. Most of the other additions you made also belong in other places. Also, please remember that this article is a featured article, so it's customary for editors to come to the talk page before making such changes, although not substantial, are important enough to get consensus before adding them. I will, however, add the content from the WA Post review to the article in the next few days. (I have a subscription to the Post, so I'll try and find the original review, which may prove helpful.) Best, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)