User talk:Krukowski

Sorry, I think I inadvertently referred to you as a POV pusher in an edit summary. Due to my being bone tired and making some sort of mistake reading the page history, I thought I was reverting one of Loomis51's little gems. Apologies. Palmiro | Talk 00:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

No harm. I was wondering why I was being attacked by a good guy. Perhaps this is just not worth getting worked up over, eh?--Krukowski 00:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You're certainly right there. I was doing quite well on that front and then allowed myself to get sucked into it again. Palmiro | Talk 00:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Hum ho. It looks like Jimbo decided to blank it, and I don't feel like having an argument with him ;). Palmiro | Talk 01:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Democratic response to 2006 State of the Union address
The Democratic response to 2006 State of the Union address was expanded and now has substantial content to justify its existence. KI 03:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Bob Fink page
Suspected vanity? Why? Every item has proof in links, news clips, whatever additional verification you want will be supplied. Here's a few you might look up to satisfy yourself: [heritage buildings] -- Fink's art [News Clip] -- Activism -- including docs we can scan from Freedom of Info records Fink received about himself. He did the things listed. Nothing is invented. [Fink's music compositions] -- composer We can fax you many other items and docs to back up whatever you doubt. We'll put more of them in the article if need it.