User talk:Krumtum

Welcome!
Hello, Krumtum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Theory of narrative thought
Hello. I have taken a look at your new article. It is fairly good, but I have some comments:
 * You clearly know the subject in depth and have views about it. However, please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We try to keep a neutral point of view. You do quite well about this, but I can tell by reading which theories you prefer.
 * On the same subject, text should be descriptive or explanatory, not narrative or essay-like. You write very well, but Wikipedia prefers clear, concise language to beautiful style. This is very useful in making our text accessible to readers of all levels.
 * One of Wikipedia's strengths is linking. Our articles link to each other, allowing readers to find more information without duplicating text. Generally, we try to keep the article only about the subject, and link to articles with information arround it. For example, see what I did in background, linking to rational choice theory and removing the description of it.
 * Although your referencing style is clear and perfectly acceptable, it will not get along well with many of the automated tools we use to make editing faster. The prefered format is to use cite templates accessible by pressing "cite" in the editing toolbar, and then selecting the appropriate type of document from the "templates" drop-down menu.
 * I moved the article to a new title which I believe, based on the header you placed at the top, to be the intended title. If you don't approve, please let me know.

Thank you for the article! Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)