User talk:Krushnarajsinh

August 2018
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Khant (caste) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch &#124; talk 18:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Related to removal of content
The reference which is provided is improper and totally wrong."Our traditions made out to be kolis",is totally incorrect information. So,i request you not to edit the changes. Krushnarajsinh (talk) 12:49, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * You need to be more clear: are you saying that the cited books do not support the content? Or are you saying that the books are wrong? Google Books has several results for "Khant Kolis". utcursch &#124; talk 14:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Removal improper content
Yes,cited book does not support the content.In that book it is not mention that,"our tradition made out to be kolis".Khant darbar (Khant/Khant rajput) and kolis are to different caste.Our tradition (Khant) and kolis traditions doesn't mix with each other.We were just intermarried with bhil womens.And also bhil and kolis are two different caste,but it doesn't means that our tradition made to be bhil or kolis. Krushnarajsinh (talk) 11:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khant (caste), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia goes by what wp:Reliable sources state. Read the book references. Disagree? See wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Jim1138 (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Wrong information
You may be right from your side,but the source which is provided is wrong.Khant rajput or khant darbar and kolis are two different caste. Our tradition doesn't turn out to be kolis. Krushnarajsinh (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * If the source is wrong, please provide another source which states it is wrong. Your personal opinion isn't acceptable: see WP:RS. utcursch &#124; talk 04:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Improper content
On which basis you can say that the source you obtained from references is 101% right. And what do you mean by "Other tradition turned out to be kolis".Our tradition belongs to raajputs, not kolis.Khant and kolis are two different caste. Krushnarajsinh (talk) 14:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Khant (caste), you may be blocked from editing. ''Please discuss your changes at the relevant talk page, Talk:Khant (caste). Regards, '' Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

wrong information
I am not making any disruptive changes. In this content it says our tradition (Khant Rajput) make out to be kolis ,why don't you understand that kolis is one different caste.Our tradition don't mix with kolis.And we are not kolis, we are khant rajput. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krushnarajsinh (talk • contribs)

November 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 18:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Repeatedly removing sourced content because you believe it to be "wrong" is going to get you blocked indefinitely in future. utcursch &#124; talk 18:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued removal of material. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 14:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)