User talk:Kryssb

Welcome!

Hello, Kryssb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Removing content
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from OPERA neutrino anomaly. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OPERA_neutrino_anomaly&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.} - DVdm (talk) 08:36, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to OPERA neutrino anomaly, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Note - Please propose on talk page first, don't just delete. See also wp:BRD. Good luck - DVdm (talk) 10:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I am sorry if my actions were too quick, but this is the first time I contribute to Wikipedia and I am unexperienced. However, I find the content about "Discussion within OPERA Collaboration" completely crazy to say the least. If the content is coming from inside OPERA, the source should be quoted. Anybody might write that he/she knows about discussions within the US Government or the Chinese one, but this is not really valuable information. Reporting personal opinions and rumors is just a way to make less credible a result not on scientific basis, but just as a result of undocumented rumors. I believe this is not the purpose of Wikipedia itself. Kryssb (talk) 10:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem about the quick actions. The idea is that you put your concerns on the article talk page, and discuss it with the other regular contributors, and try get a consensus about the removal. So the best thing to do now is to create a little new section at the bottom of the article talk page Talk:OPERA neutrino anomaly. By the way, I have removed that rather harsh 3rd level warning above — sorry about that. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)