User talk:Krystamonopoli

Annals of Occupational Hygiene
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Annals of Occupational Hygiene, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/annhyg/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Annals of Occupational Hygiene
A tag has been placed on Annals of Occupational Hygiene requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Talk tome (Intelati) 15:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I personally searched the article and the website. the article matched word for word with the article.-- Talk tome (Intelati) 15:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I compared the article to the website and found that the article was substantially copied from the website. Without a non-infringing version to revert back to, I deleted the article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)