User talk:Ks159081

Welcome!
Hello, Ks159081, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Skrillex have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Spike Wilbury (talk) 17:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Kimveer Gill
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast 00:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of peckerwood gangs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Latin Kings and Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Doc Strange. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Chester Bennington seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 21:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)  Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 21:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Prisonoffenders.com
Exactly how do you think this site passed WP:RS? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Let's start with the most obvious one, prisonoffenders.com. Where is the evidence of editorial oversight? Where is the reputation for fact checking? Do they accept user generated content? Where am I getting these questions.... from the policy on reliable sources. Have you read it? (no sarcasm needed). Once you understand the most obvious example, we can discuss the other one. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok. I just looks at the website and you know there other things that seems like they got right, but it does kinda looks like it was made by some white smartass, but yeah. Now I want to get the biggest question why leaving out the "ThoughtCo." page out, it got some reliable source, plus this is what is on the Aryan Brotherhood's page, well the article about them anyways. Ks159081 (talk) 10:54 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, what they get right or not right isn't the issue. The essay WP:TRUTH sort of explains it well. The ThoughtCo. one is when I look at the specific entry, it's written by some "contributor" that is a private investigator. There are good, legit reliable sources that give us info. If we can't find some rivalry documented in a reliable source, it probably isn't notable enough to include anyway. Infoboxes are supposed to be a snapshot of info, not an exhaustive listing. It should really only include major, notable rivalries and alliances. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Gary Menke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Menke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gary Menke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Most Evil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverdale ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Most_Evil check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Most_Evil?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of most common surnames in Europe into List of common Spanish surnames. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Excessively long for the infobox
Those levels of details belong in the body of the text IMO. Generally we keep the infobox to a few key symptoms. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 04:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Copy and pasting
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-common-signs-of-ADHD-ADD

http://www.bhcwausau.com/services/psychological-testing/

Refs
These are really required. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Larry Bissonnette for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Bissonnette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Larry Bissonnette until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sgerbic (talk) 01:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Megaman en m. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Asperger syndrome, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Megaman en m (talk) 08:04, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fourth-Degree relative


The article Fourth-Degree relative has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Previously deleted as non-notable; still non-notable, and always going to be non-notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBL (talk) 22:33, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Chicago Bears broadcasters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages WDBQ and KBOB. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)