User talk:Ksenna19

Welcome
Hi, Ksenna19. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kyle Kalish. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  02:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Kyle Kalish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

October 2013
Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kyle Kalish, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Melmann (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Deleting Kyle Kalish
Hi Ksenna19. Whilst I could have deleted the article Kyle Kalish (by blanking the page and requesting deletion, you effectively invoked WP:G7 - as the (pretty much) sole author of the page, you are entitled to ask for it to be deleted) I've chosen not to do so without discussing it with you. You gave the reason for deletion as "excessive vandalism", but heavily-vandalised pages are not deleted simply because they are targeted by disruptive users. The usual approach is to apply page protection, which you can request at this page. Protection can either stop unregistered users from editing the article altogether, or cause their edits to be subject to review before going "live". If you'd still like the article deleted, you can replace the deletion tag (I'd recommend using ) or ask me on my talkpage and I'll do it for you. However, you might want to consider requesting page protection as an alternative. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm XXX8906. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kyle Kalish with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. XXX8906 (talk) 23:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kyle Kalish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Kalish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kyle Kalish until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 13:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Ksenna19. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kyle Kalish, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Donnie Park (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)