User talk:Kseses14/sandbox

Logistical changes: In your paragraph describing the effect on cancer, you said "a review article noted, however, ...", which doesn't seem necessary since you are citing the article. Avoid using very because that tends to be more subjective rather than objective. I would either include a number (for example with the amount if small observational studies) or have some kind of range. When describing studies, it might be more helpful to include a year, so "the 1978 study" or "the women's health study" just to make it a little more specific. If it is possible, when you describe rates, rather than just saying rates decreases, it might be beneficial to include numbers that show just how much this changed.

I think your article looks good so far. One thing I noticed is that there is a positive tone to intermittent fasting and not much portraying the negative side to intermittent fasting aside from user error. I would try to look into that a little more and see if there are observed side effects that would discourage people from participating in these diets that are internal (such as dehydration which you mentioned) rather than just the dropout rates and binge eating. Your discussion about natural selection causing mutations in favor of intermittent fasting is interesting. I would expand on that if possible. Another thing you can expand on would be the mental health effects such as with Alzheimer's if there is more research backing that. Also, I don't know how easy it would be to find, but there might be numbers showing increases in overall health after Ramadan in majority Muslim populations. There may be some correlation there, but I don't think this article should focus on the religious aspect of that. It might just be useful to look at numbers of individuals who participate in IF for a specific period of time. I feel like you were planning on doing this anyway, but make sure to add to the other effects as well. The lsat thing I picked up on was the overall structure of the article. I don't feel like "Popular Culture" fits where it is now so maybe try restructuring the article a little. Taylor O&#39;Neil (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Pinecone1500 Peer Review
In the Practice and Variants section you say "The strictest form would be alternate day fasting (ADF)" Change would be to "is", its more direct and concise.

Again in this section, you say "Some would say only water". This is also feels somewhat informal. It might be better to rephrase this to "in some cases..."

The effects on aging and cancer all look good. I would try and put a citation in the Other Effects section though. I also wonder if there are any other effects you could outline as this section seems a bit lacking. If you cant find any credible effects, maybe outline study's that have been contested regarding the behavior.

In the concerns section you say "begs questions" I think beg is a little colloquial. Try a different word or restructuring the sentence.

In the popular culture section, the focus seems to be primarily on the UK. It might be interesting to see how the behavior has taken in other nations and cultures. Is this kind of diet only found in western nations? Are there any cultures or religions that have used intermittent fasting in the past, making it a cultural staple? All things that could be fun to explore.

Overall, the article is very good. You have a few parts that don't sound as academic as they could. All of the sections are very well rounded though, not many weak points.