User talk:Ksimmons8888

Welcome!

Hello, Ksimmons8888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Charles R. “Chuck” Perry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  14:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles R. “Chuck” Perry


A tag has been placed on Charles R. “Chuck” Perry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  14:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Carolyn Wasilewski.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carolyn Wasilewski.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and took care of this for you. Wikipedia's image-use rules can be quote difficult to grasp, and it appears that you left off one of the two separate templates needed for a fair-use photograph of a person. I also added in the name of the article in which the image is used, which is also a requirement.  Horologium  (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry I got a little snarky, been a month of a lot of stupid wiki drama and I have something like 3000 articles on my watchlist. I also was annoyed by your preachy and pretentious edit summary, so shot back more of the same, though with an intent of noogies more than snark. I suppose everyone has to be aware that some of what they write may carry an emotional tone that was not the tone intended. Montanabw (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carolyn Wasilewski


The article Carolyn Wasilewski has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, WP:BIO1E.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 22:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Carolyn Wasilewski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carolyn Wasilewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carolyn Wasilewski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 14:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1956 chrysler norseman concept.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:1956 chrysler norseman concept.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)