User talk:Ksteinharter

Speedy deletion nomination of Gust Goettl


A tag has been placed on Gust Goettl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Sign your posts
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Phoenix, Arizona, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, please do not remove templates from article(s) without giving reason. David J Johnson (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to High Efficiency Astro Air Piggyback System‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The only things I removed were them being considered orphans, because I fixed the problems at hand. In both instances I linked them to other Wikipedia articles. Please advise how else I can resolve the problem. Ksteinharter (talk) 04:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You do know that we can see exactly what edits you made, right? You removed a COI tag, a primary sources tag, and a refimprove tag from this article here . I didn't restore the COI tag since I'm not sure about it, but your edits made no attempt at all to address the issue of poor references and primary sources. You should not have removed those and I restored them. Stop messing with maintenance tags. Meters (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)