User talk:Kstrin8/sandbox

No article to edit.

PEER REVIEW
Hi, my laptop was not showing your article, so I wrote that you did not have an article.(the post above) When I got on my brother's desktop this past week, I saw that your article was done in time. Sorry for the miscommunication. With that said, your article looks good. You are direct and to the point, your sources all look good, and you stayed on topic. You might need to embed links in your article. Overall, you did a great job! I might would add a couple more details to expand your topic! Djon141 (talk) 00:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Response to Peer Review
In response to the single peer review I had, I decided to incorporate their suggestions of embedding a link into my article section. I embedded a link to the word technology so readers can easily see what all the term technology encompasses. I also added details by introducing the term digital citizenship since it is not defined in the original "Digital Citizen" article. In response to my instructor's feedback, I added another source and tried to edit the tone of this section. I reworded some sentences, and reworded the 3 explanations of the principles so that they sound more state of fact rather than more of an essay tone. Thank you for the constructive feedback. Kstrin8 (talk) 02:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)