User talk:Ksy92003/Archive-Nov2007

Return specialist
You'll probably notice what I did to the Ted Ginn, Jr. article, and I know we've both edited that before there. I really think "Return specialist" is the right phrase to use there rather than to write both out, plus doing the latter takes up two lines in the infobox which I'd prefer to avoid. Do you have any idea what we might be able to do about this? Make a Return specialist article? Redirect the phrase somewhere? I understand why you're wary about linking it to Kickoff returner, but I feel like that phrase is the best way to go no matter where it links. Plus, Kickoff returner does say they often double as punt returners.► Chris Nelson Holla! 00:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, I didn't notice the edit. I had taken Ginn's article off my watchlist a couple weeks ago.  As for the edit you made, I don't oppose it.  The reason why I said them separately was because the Dolphins' roster template had him as a "KR" and "PR" at the time of the edit.  I know a lot about the football rules and stuff, but I'm not familiar with the positions exactly.  Hey, after Tony Romo held the snap on the failed PAT in the playoffs last year (which I saw in San Francisco on vacation), I thought that maybe everybody on every team doubled up at some position.  It does look quite horrid having two lines in the infobox for the position, and I haven't seen that happen anywhere else, so that's definitely something we should avoid.  I'm not sure if we should create a return specialist article because I'm sure there are many kick returners who don't return punts, and vice versa, and therefore a unified article wouldn't necessarily apply to some of them.  It's something to consider though.  Ksy92003  (talk)  00:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah I mean some guys handle both jobs, it just depends. Devin Hester, Dante Hall, Ted Ginn, Jr., guys like that, guys that are really good returners or are at least expected to be (in Ginn's case) usually handle both, so "Return specialist" is a much better label for them than "kick and punt returner." But yeah, there are plenty of teams that have different guys do each. Just depends on if you have one of those guys that's got great athletic ability and some serious return skills.


 * And in case you didn't know, holders used to often be backup QBs but now punters mostly handle the job.► Chris Nelson Holla! 00:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Also, I'm not so sure I agree on that last edit. I think parentheses is perfect for that sentence. It's not incorrect to write that way, and the sentence itself is just a little thrown-in piece of info not directly related to Ginn's career. I'm not sure I see the reason for avoiding sentences in parentheses - nothing wrong with it as far as writing goes.► Chris Nelson Holla! 00:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Devin Hester can play practically every offensive position. Kick returner, punt returner, wide receiver, running back, you name it.  Heck, Smith could put him as the team's third quarterback on the depth chart, and he'd still probably do better than any quarterback the Dolphins have... no offense.  They are just pretty bad this year.


 * Gramatically, I don't think there's anything wrong with [using parenthesis in that case], but since it was a complete sentence, I would think that we could at least just leave the two sentences separated as two sentences, minus the parenthesis. In my opinion, either using a comma to join the two together or even using a semicolon instead of the parenthesis would be alright, as well.  Ksy92003  (talk)  00:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Whoops
Cheers, thanks for alerting me to this. I had no idea :-P -- Pump  me  up  07:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Linking cities and states
I really think it'd odd the way you link both the city and state separately, and I'd like to find out what the preferred method of doing it is here. I mean it seems to me if you have an article, for example Berkeley Lake, Georgia you link to it directly. The way you're doing it, it'd make since to link Houston Texans as Houston Texans or college football as college football. I have to imagine that if an article exists, that's what you link to.► Chris Nelson Holla! 22:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The reason why I link it is kinda hard for me to explain. I'm not sure if I can explain it.  When I make those changes, I don't do it individually.  I only make those changes when I'm making other edits already because I personally don't think it matters that much.  I just think it would be helpful to link to both a city and a state.  There is no right or wrong way, but this would be something interesting to ding out about, maybe at WP:MOS or something.  But I don't go out of my way to make those changes; I only make those edits when there is another edit I'm making to that article.  So personally, I don't think it is a big deal, and there isn't really any problem with doing it either way.  Ksy92003  (talk)  22:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Well I do think one way should be decided on as the correct way. Otherwise, you could theoretically break up every multi-word link.► Chris Nelson Holla! 22:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Before I make this comment, know that I'm not arguing with you about this, if it sounds like I am. Both ways link to the city in a proper manner.  To me, it would make sense that if somebody wanted to click on the link to go to the city's article, then they'd probably click on the city name instead of the state.  Both ways are good in my opinion, but on second thought, it would still be best to have them all the same way.


 * I saw the comment you left Durova. You could've mentioned that it was me in that comment, but I still won't do anything else until after she comments.  Ksy92003  (talk)  22:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Colorado Avalanche seasons
Template:Colorado Avalanche seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jmlk 1  7  22:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Same game?
Your first ever edits at Help desk are to criticize my actions. Following me around would not be wise. I'm going to ask you nicely to take my pages off your watchlist. —Wknight94 (talk) 00:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I saw on my watchlist that an anon made a 1,000+ edit on a page on my watchlist and looked at their contributions, and saw that their most recent edit was to the help desk, and out of curiosity, I checked it out. It had nothing to do with the fact that it was you.  Is there anything wrong with looking at one person's contributions and joining in on a discussion that person started?  It's the same thing as if you were joining in on a conversation at WP:ANI.  I didn't go there because it was you.  I went there because I saw that the anon had a 1,000+ comment about something you did, and I went to give my opinion.  I'm sorry that I have opinions about things.


 * I was not following you around, and I'd appreciate it if you'd assume good faith. I'm sure that if I did something that you thought was wrong, and somebody had come here about it and taken it to ANI or something, that you would give your opinion also.  I didn't criticize you, and even if I did, I'm free to make those comments if I think that you were wrong.  I'm sorry if you didn't like what I had to say there; it's not my fault.  Please tell me where it says that I'm forbidden from giving my opinions on a discussion that I came to from a page on my watchlist.  Ksy92003  (talk)  01:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * So it's a coincidence that the first discussion you ever contribute to at the help desk is to criticize me after the troll left a message on my talk page? Give me an ounce of credit.  You have a long history of stalking people's contributions and even got blocked for it once.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * When I was blocked, that happened when I didn't know that it was against a policy, and the user I was "stalking" was the one who unblocked me after I explained to him that I didn't know it was against policy. As for this case, I saw he made a huge edit, and I looked at his contributions because I wanted to know why he left you that comment.  I saw he was at the help desk and I knew it was about what he had told you.  I read the discussion.  I commented.  Nothing wrong with that.  Ksy92003  (talk)  02:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * And I already admitted at the help desk that I was wrong after I was told about evidence that I couldn't possibly see. You don't need to make this a bigger deal than it needs to be, especially when I already admitted that I was wrong.  It's not my fault that there was evidence that I couldn't see.  If I had that evidence, I would've agreed with you.  But you overreacted.  I'm sorry.  Sue me.  Ksy92003  (talk)  02:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * So you traced it through my talk page. I'll ask again that you take my page off your watchlist.  I won't be talking to or about you there so there's no reason for you to watch it, especially if you are watching it to make uninformed and incorrect criticism of my actions.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how many times I have to say this, so I'll say this one time, and hopefully you'll listen to me this time. I admitted that I was wrong. You admitted that there was evidence that I couldn't have possibly seen, and I said that I would've agreed with you if I had that evidence. I don't know what more you want from me. When I made that comment, it was based on everything that I could've seen. If there's more evidence that I can't see, that's not my fault. I can't help that. You get mad at me when I make a fair comment, and you don't except an apology when I said that I would agree with you. I don't know what more you want from me. Ksy92003 (talk)  02:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Third time now: what I want from you is for you to remove my talk page from your watchlist. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I already have. Maybe you should take the same advice and remove this page from your watchlist, because it doesn't seem like you're gonna apologize or anything.  But even still, that doesn't ignore the fact that you're unfairly getting mad at me for something silly.  Don't you think you're blowing this out of proportion?  I wish I could say something, but knowing you, you're probably gonna block me for saying it.  Ksy92003  (talk)  02:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * If you're waiting for an apology, then you're correct that you can stop waiting. FWIW, I have no idea what your last sentence means.  I am not planning on blocking you and it's laughable that you would think you know me.  Suddenly I sympathize more with Chrisjnelson than I thought possible.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * In that last sentence, I meant that there is something that I want to say, but I'm smart enough to know not to say it for fear of being blocked for WP:CIVIL should you take it that way. I said I was working on this.  I'm thinking about what I say before I say it, and I'm not going to take the risk of saying something I feel I need to say because you might block me for WP:CIVIL.


 * And it doesn't matter much to me how much you sympathize with me. In my opinion, you're just one person, and whatever goes on between us doesn't change how other people think of me.  If you don't want to sympathize with me, I could care less.


 * And I know you well enough. In the past weeks, you have come to my talk page acting mad at me for such trivial issues.  In two cases, you have gotten mad at me for trying to resolve a long-lasting conflict and once for making a fair, good-faith comment on a noticeboard.  Both of these actions I've taken are encouraged, and you've discouraged me in each case.  So why wouldn't I think that you would block me for a potentially-uncivil comment?  Isn't it a positive sign that I'm thinking about the consequences before acting?  Apparently not.  Ksy92003  (talk)  03:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Hector Lopez
Hector Lopez failed at WP:GAC mainly because we did not have any information other than his professional baseball career. I would suspect if we could find anything about him from before 1952 we would meet with success. I will check if there are any books on Latin American baseball players.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I wasn't even aware that the article was up at WP:GAC. I'll continue to contribute when I find anything else I can add.  Ksy92003  (talk)  23:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Do you know if they use any sort of click through or traffic monitor on pages. I just added a header template and am thinking that if they use some sort of technological assessment of whether a page is complete to the satisfaction of readers we may have gotten a false negative based on the number of people who got to the page and were looking for something that wasn't there.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know; I wouldn't even have a guess. Ksy92003  (talk)  22:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

You're Back!
It had been quite a while since your last edit. Where have you been? User:BrianY (Hornberry) already started the page for the next season and I started all the standings templates. I don't have time to create the game log for the Angels too, but I don't think I have much time to work on the game log. I see that you strongly opposed Hdt83 for having four RFAs in five months. I strongly supported him because he's a very helpful person. He was the first person to put something in my talk page which was a welcome message. He gave me advice the first month I made my account. Seeing your opinion about Hdt83 helped me know that you're back. LADodgersAngelsfan 06:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I just hadn't edited for a while because I had a bunch of homework to do last night: AP Calculus, AP Spanish, and Government. I wasn't able to focus on Wikipedia until after I had completed all that last night.  I'll work on the Angels' stuff when I have the opportunity.  I'll have a lot to say if A-Rod comes to Anaheim.


 * As for the RfA, I didn't strongly oppose him so much because it was his fourth RfA in five months... it was mostly because it was his fourth self-nom in five months. This really gives the impression that he is desperate to become an admin, so to speak, and that he really wants to have the power.  My oppose was mainly based on just that.  Ksy92003  (talk)  13:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

My Rfa
Thanks for voting in my Rfa, which I withdrew from yesterday. Though I did not get promoted, I see this Rfa as being a success nonetheless. What I got out of this Rfa will help me to be a better, all around editor. Because of this Rfa I have decided to become better in other areas of editing. I'm not going to just be a vandalfighter. Though vandalfighting is good, being active in all areas of editing is even better. Have a nice day.--SJP 22:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I replied to your oppose vote at Hdt83's adminship vote Stupid2 23:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Lee Smith
who no's why I did it, your right it was really stupid to do, by the way do you know how to change your name, I dont want to be called Rockies17 anymore they embarass me, 4-0 do you believe that shit--Rockies17 03:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

This guy is not a real fan.► Chris Nelson Holla! 03:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, I was a fan of the Rockies when they swept Philadelphia and Arizona... I lost all respect for them when the Red Sox swept them. Of course since I'm an Angel fan, the Red Sox winning the World Series was the last thing I wanted.  But oh well.  Hopefully the billion-dollar man comes to the Big A.  Ksy92003  (talk)  06:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe he can change his name to BandwagonJumper69.► Chris Nelson Holla! 06:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe I should make that my name =D I jumped on the Rox' bandwagon when they won 21 of 22.  When Oakland won 20 consecutive games in 2002, I didn't jump on their bandwagon because they kept my Angels from winning the AL West.  But we know what happened later that postseason, don't we you A's fans?  Heck, I was even talking with some A's fans I saw at the Kings/Sharks hockey game I went to tonight and brought that up.  "Hey, you may have won 20 games in a row, but we were the ones to win 11 games in October, '02!"


 * Fortunately, the A's are selling all their talent (Mulder, Hudson, and Zito all since '02 is ridiculous) and are relying on who these past couple years, Thomas and Piazza? Hey, maybe Mo Vaughn can come out of retirement and help them... unless he breaks his leg in the top of the first inning of the first game of the season, like he did for the Angels.  Although in Vaughn's defense, if it weren't for him, the '00 Angels (might not be '00, maybe '99) wouldn't have been the only team in MLB history to have four 30+ home run hitters (Tim Salmon, Troy Glaus, Garret Anderson, and Mo Vaughn) in a season.  This is funny because you look at the Angels now, and you wouldn't imagine that they are the only team to achieve any sort of home run-related accomplishment.


 * Sorry for rambling on; I just wanna say something because I don't wanna go to bed now, at 12:30... especially with daylight savings time; we get one more hour of sleep =D But speaking of the Bay Area, at the hockey game tonight, when Jeremy Roenick came out of the Sharks tunnel, where I was just because I wanted to say "you suck, J.R.!," I was booing him and said "you suck" and all that [because he wasn't that great when he played for the Kings two years ago].  He just pointed at me and winked at me.  Of course, thanks to karma, he ended up scoring the game-winning goal, much to the disgust of 18,118 people at the "Sports and Entertainment Capital of the World."  Funny how things like that happen, huh?  It'd be like you going to Barry Bonds and saying to him "here's a syringe... oh sorry, you already have enough" and then him going out to hit a walk-off grand slam into McCovey Cove to clinch the NL Pennant in game 7 over the Los Angeles Dodgers.  But in this case, it was worth it just to be able to have one of the greatest American hockey players ever acknowledge something that I said to him, especially negatively.  Roenick is a classy guy, and he's always giving pucks to the fans and talking with them, having fun with them.  It's actually quite a shame that Kings fans boo him beecause he wasn't great with us.  He's a great player, and an even better person.  Ksy92003  (talk)  07:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Well rooting for a team is one thing. Jumping on a bandwagon is another. I rooted for the Rockies, but I'm a Braves fan and an 0-162 season couldn't change that. Real fans stick through the bad times. Makes the good times all the more sweeter.► Chris Nelson Holla! 14:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * ...which is why I'm still a [Los Angeles] Kings fan. Ksy92003  (talk)  14:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

See what I mean? Haha.► Chris Nelson Holla! 05:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Boy did you ever make a point :) Ksy92003  (talk)  05:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
 Thank you for voicing your opinions in my recent RFA which unfortunately did not pass at (47/23/5). I will be sure to take the advice the community has given me and wait till someone nominates me next time as well as improve my editing skills. Have a great day(or night)! -- Hdt 83     Chat 05:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Baseball infobox needed
Francis_Wistert ( http://www.baseball-reference.com/w/wistewh01.shtml ) needs a baseball infobox also. Can you lend a hand?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. It is not uncommon to have two infoboxes (see Jim Bunning).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Done. Ksy92003 (talk)  23:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. This week I am working on the Wistert Brothers. Looking at Al Wistert, I think his article could really benefit from two types of templates. He could use 1948 and 1949 championship team templates. Who would you go to for either of these things? Unfortunately, unlike the NBA and MLB or even the NCAA, we have not produced championship teams for the NFL. Is there a reason for this? He could also use a Philadelphia Eagles captaincy succession box or navbox.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know why we don't have annual football templates, although I believe has tried to start this for the Pro Bowl templates.  If you want to create the templates for that, and have the resources to do so (I don't know where to get the football players from) then feel free to take that task upon yourself.  Ksy92003  (talk)  00:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I have been trying to get the number parameter to work in the template you added. Why isn't the number showing up?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * It isn't showing up because the MLB player infoboxes don't contain a parameter for jersey numbers in their code. Ksy92003  (talk)  22:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Joe Torre
sorry for adding the present back in the infobox, I didnt see what you wrote, your right it is dumb to write present--Yankees10 04:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * No worries. It was easy to overlook.  Ksy92003  (talk)  04:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Another RfA Spaming
 Thank you for constructive criticism in my recent RFA which did not pass at (18/27/10). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait until someone nominates me next time. Thank you for you comments! Tiptoety 00:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

History of baseball team nicknames
Thanks for improving the somewhat-weaselly wording about the Angels. "No small amount" is a way of saying "kind of a large amount". But your way of putting it is quite sufficient. Meanwhile, I still think the Dodgers should follow the Angels' lead and rename themselves "The Brooklyn Dodgers of Los Angeles". Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * If the Dodgers were to change their name to that, I think that'd be pretty cool. I really would like it if they did because they are one of the most historic sports franchises ever, and they had great history in Brooklyn... if they were to call themselves the "Brooklyn Dodgers of Los Angeles" then that'd be a great way of incorporating their great history in New York with their history in Southern California.


 * As for the edit I made, I hate it when people use double negatives or phrases such as "not small"... "not small" or "large". You be the judge.  Ksy92003  (talk)  05:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * There's a subtle difference between "not small" and "large". But the former can look weaselly. The Dodgers won't rename themselves. That would be a negative, as there are many who are still resentful that the Dodgers abandoned Brooklyn. But it's a good fantasy. :) Quick: Can you name the members of the defunct leagues, the National Association (1871-75) and the American Association (1882-91), which are operating today in MLB? Extra credit for naming the last operational ballparks which originated from (1) the Players League of 1890; (2) the Federal League of 1914-15; and (3) the NA and the AA. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 05:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow... trivia questions at 10:00 at night... on a school night. I'm not good at that kind of trivia.  I'm only really good at modern trivia, like post-1980s.  I'll guess the Reds and Phillies, Wrigley and Fenway, and something else.  Betcha I failed... a "three-and-out" for me, I predict.  Ksy92003  (talk)  06:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

You're on the right track. And don't neglect school for trivia. I think these are the answers, though I have not scrutinized them in detail:

NA 1871-75
 * Surviving members: Atlanta (Boston/Milwaukee) Braves, Chicago Cubs - also the last two surviving NL charter members
 * Last surviving ballpark - Sportman's Park, St. Louis, demolished 1966, field still used for sports.

AA 1882-91
 * Surviving members: Los Angeles (Brooklyn) Dodgers, Cincinnati Reds, Pittsburgh Pirates, St. Louis Cardinals
 * Last surviving ballpark - Crosley Field, Cincinnati, demolished 1970.

PL 1890
 * Surviving members: none
 * Last surviving ballpark - Polo Grounds, New York, demolished 1964.

FL 1914-15
 * Surviving members: none
 * Last surviving ballpark - Wrigley Field, Chicago, flourishing 2007.

Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 06:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Well... I got Wrigley right =) Like 1-for-infinity.  Ksy92003  (talk)  13:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

image
i never uploaded that image, i dont even know how to upload a image--Rockies17 22:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

no problem--Rockies17 19:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know
I just wanted to let you know that I just reported User:Ksy9200 to WP:UAA as being too close to your username. Just based on a hunch and his contribs, I have the feeling it could be a sock of User:Starwars1955. Just thought you would like to know. Good luck editing. Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 21:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay. Thanks for letting me know.  Ksy92003  (talk)  00:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Baseball Infoboxes
you know the thing on the football infobox where you just have to type in the name of the team and it automatically has the colors, do you have any clue how to do that for the baseball infoboxes, cause I think with free agency coming up, it would be much easier and would take less time, I asked Chris Nelson if he knew but he hasnt responded yet, so I though i'd ask you--Yankees10 02:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * There is a specific part of the code for the NFL infobox that allows that to happen.  was going to try to do the same for baseball before he got indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.  Chris is the one person I can think of who is familiar with the parser function used in the infobox codes, and I would assume that he would know how to do it if he wanted to.  I suggest you ask him again in case he simply just didn't notice your comment.  Ksy92003  (talk)  03:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok thanks--Yankees10 23:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

My (Remember the dot)'s RfA
I never thanked you for participating in my RfA a couple of weeks ago. Thank you for your support, though unfortunately the request was closed as "no consensus". I plan to run again at a later time, and I hope you will support me again then.

Thanks again! —Remember the dot (talk) 06:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Luc Robitaille GA
You need about a 3 paragraph lead for an internet era All-star professional athlete GA. You could add one summing up his statistical accomplishiments (x 50 goal seaons, y all-star games, z playoff appearances)

You might add an entire lead para about his playoff career if he did anything significant.

You might want to subsection the main text in that big section. Maybe All-star years (up to 94) and the rest or three sections. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 21:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You also could link some hockey terms like goals, assists. It seems to me that the All-star years I would think should have more text without doing any research.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 21:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That could work.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 21:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You should take a look at comparable GAs.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 22:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you find at least one reference per paragraph? That is a very common standard for high quality articles nowadays.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 23:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

FYI: You might be able to use these as sources: Move Over Taylor: Robitaille Is The New King Of Kings and Robitaille Receives The Ultimate Honor. I know the author personally. :-) Seriously speaking, they contain a lot of information that might be useful for the article. -- Gmatsuda 07:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * For GA you are going to have to give the article a tertiary resource feel. I.E., you are going to have to cite enough secondary sources that it sounds like everything you are saying is being said by a reliable source and that all facts are attributable or could be easily verified.  You are making good progress though.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 22:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Heath Shuler & Charlie Ward
I think Heath Shuler & Charlie Ward should have two infoboxes.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 18:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know where to get the information to complete the infoboxes. Those aren't baseball players, so I'm not familiar with where to get the necessary stuff.  Ksy92003  (talk)  15:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Nick Gorneault
Good work, but the 5x rule is pretty strict.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 21:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. check out WP:LEAD. You could beef that up.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 21:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)