User talk:Kt5919/sandbox

Peer Review
The content added to the Varying beliefs sections is neutral and contains a lot of information not found in the original article. It is descriptive and supportive to the article. Followed both sources (one online & one book) and they are reliable, not bias, and support the claim. Maybe adding a few more sources and integrating them in the content itself would be helpful (as I was told to do so also by professor). Other than that there does not seem to be any serious mechanical errors. Mvillalba8 (talk) 17:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review #2
Refrain from using "They" in the third sentence because it can cause some confusion because you referenced three groups in the prior sentence. Instead of just saying "There was a movement" name the date of the movement because it will sound more credible and academic along with being more informative. In the beginning of the second paragraph add the "Also" to the beginning of the sentence. Same with the start of the third paragraph or find a different word then also because it could sound repetitive. Maybe split up that same sentence because it kind of drones on a little bit and gets convoluted. Overall, the article is informative and neutral. Just cite your sources within the paragraphs. Bsanchez79 (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC)