User talk:Ktashkulov/Poppers

Miles Thompson Peer Review: 1. Do you see gaps that remain? Your 21st century resurgence section is really small. Consider adding more information such as, why did poppers make a resurgence? Talk a little more about the subculture of "popper pigs"? There also seems to be a gap in their history. There is no recorded history on the page from the time of discovery (mid 1800s) to the 1960s. Something noteworthy likely occurred in that time period. The administration section of the page seems very sparse. Are there really no other techniques to ingest besides inhalation?

2. Do you think they could make one or more points clearer? Some sentences are a little wordy. "The use of poppers in combination with anal sex has given rise to trends where users, mostly gay men, with high use of poppers in combination with sex correlates with users..." could be shortened to, "The use of poppers in combination with anal sex, mostly by gay men, reveals a trend where users are more likely....". Regarding that information, be careful to not imply that correlation=causation. Overall, I think you need to add more content. There is very little you wrote to give a complete peer review.

Let me know if you have any questions.

I agree with Miles, your section about the risks is repetitive and long. It would be cleaner and more precise if you were to trim it down. The section about Japan would be a good area to expand; it only says that they are illegal, maybe you could find a good source exploring why poppers are illegal there. The administration and effects section seems to be lacking in information as well. Maybe some more research a about the guy who invented poppers would help as well--I know there is a little bit about it and a section on the chemistry of them, but maybe adding in details of his trials with the drug. Jweaver8 —Preceding undated comment added 01:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)