User talk:Ktr101/Archive 8

Operation Majestic Titan
I saw that you tried to sign up and were unable to find the contributors section, so I added your name to our contributor section myself. Sorry it was unclear as to how to add your name to the contributors section, I'll look into that and see if we can't make it easier for people wanting to join us.

Welcome aboard, on behalf of all of us. Its always nice to have a new editor, and even nicer to have a contributor whose credentials match mine (I majored in history at the University of Texas at El Paso, and minored political science :) If you have any comments, questions, or observations feel free to leave them on our project talk page, or you can get in touch with me on my talk page. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing this, as I wasn't sure how to do that. Glad to be a part of the project! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=628699111 your edit] to Indigenous People's Day may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=630593903 your edit] to Great Chelsea Fire of 1908 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * homeless, and 350 acres were burned in the fire. The fire started two hundred yards away from the Great Chelsea Fire of 1973.{{cite news|title=Great Chelsea Fire of 1908|url=http://www.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Humanitas


Hello Ktr101. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Humanitas".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Assistance requested
Kevin, I meant to contact you sooner and I apologize now for my delay which is resulting in such short notice: Houghton Library, Harvard, is hosting a relatively small-scale Wikipedia training session and editathon on the afternoon of Monday, October 20th. We anticipate mostly library staff and other members of that community. I was hoping to have assistance from a couple other experienced Wikipedians. Are you interested/available? --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

AKA Red John
Hey there. I got an email from Tree about a requested account I sent to OTRS. The reason I did this is that there were multiple living persons that were notable with this name. Between the list on the disambig page and my search results on Google once I filtered out all of the crap social media crap (yeah, I said crap twice), I just didn't feel comfortable with anyone with a name that had that many hits for possible notability not verifying who they were. The gov email address from an IP that was blocked multiple times for block evasion by a specific duck indicated to me that this user could be from anywhere in the country and there were a couple from the states in the list of notables. Anyways... Happy editing! — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 19:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for explaining the situation, as I only saw the name their real name when they sent me the OTRS request and not Red John. I also received the e-mail from the government e-mail, and there was no other information available besides that. I also didn't see anything on Wikipedia in terms of any notable living persons by that name. Regardless, I just assumed good faith there and created it, so sorry about any trouble that that might have caused on your end! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Spam on outreach
Please delete this page Best regards. Grind24 (talk) 19:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for leaving me that message! In the future, another editor will likely get to it within the day, so you don't need to send me a message each time there is spam on the site. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Great Chelsea Fire of 1908
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Great Chelsea Fire of 1908, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.booksshouldbefree.com/book/Souvenir-Book-of-the-Great-Chelsea-Fire-April-12.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Buildings and structures in Brighton, New York
Category:Buildings and structures in Brighton, New York, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –  T M F  (talk) 02:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Harald Jäger
Hello,

I just reviewed the above. As you noted in your nomination, a shorter hook is needed. Also, you should tag the article as being the Biography of a Living Person (BLP). Once you have approval of a hook by a new editor, I believe you should be good to go.

Georgejdorner (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Harald Jäger
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Support for Wikimedia grant- Lowell Edit-A-Thons
Hi Kevin! Winifred Flint from Pollard Memorial Library and I are trying to run some edit-a-thons in Lowell starting in December. We have a grant in to Wikimedia and we would really appreciate it if you could check it out, make some comments, and endorse it. We are working on our promotional stuff right now and will hopefully have something very soon to pass on to the NE group. Thanks! --LibraryGurl (talk) 18:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Sara! I have already gone ahead and endorsed the grant, as it looks incredibly thorough. Feel free to e-mail it to the group as well, as I am sure that others will be interested in supporting it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:46, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

George Bacon (CIA officer)
Hello,

Let's make that "attempted return"" of the remains, shall we?

Georgejdorner (talk) 21:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Works for me, so thanks for clarifying that! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Independence Mall (Massachusetts), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHDH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-A-Thon
Thank you for supporting the grant. I am making sure you get the official invite!

--LibraryGurl (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bozo: The World's Most Famous Clown
 * added a link pointing to Tom Baron


 * Proposed New England Revolution South Boston stadium
 * added a link pointing to Southeast Expressway

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Trimax Mowing Systems
Hi Kevin! I'm new to wiki and hope you could give me some comment on my draft page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Trimax_Mowing_Systems. Since my draft page was denied I added some reliable sources to the page. I would appreciate if you could help me with some advice on how to improve the page. Thank you and have a nice day Yuckfou2 (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks good, and I have gone ahead and improved it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thank you very much! When translating the page into German, can I still use the English sources? Yuckfou2 (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes you can, as long as you know what parameters to put the things in. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

01:07:50, 21 November 2014 review of submission by Geg42
I am requesting review for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/J._Gerald_Hebert. While you are correct that Hebert is not sufficiently notable as a professor, I believe the criteria should be based on his primary occupation of attorney. I have supplemented the section on his working in bailing out jurisdictions under the Voting Rights Act. Further, I had updated the formatting with the help of users from the wikipedia help channel (Iaritmioawp and nonsenseferret).

Thanks for your consideration.

Geg42 (talk) 01:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You're going to have to re-submit it so that I can take a look at it at my convenience. Additionally, I would suggest finishing up the article before doing so, as it looks like the paragraph is not complete. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Top article creators when compared to the rest of the community, 8 January 2014.svg
Dear Kevin,

how have you generated this diagram?--Kopiersperre (talk) 22:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I added all of the data up from this page, and then subtracted the total from the number of edits, found in Template:NUMBEROFEDITS, at the time. I will run the list again in January, so let me know if you have any suggestions before then! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm from german wikipedia, and many people there have opt-outed from the list. Is it possible to gather this data from a dump?--Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, as might be able to explain it a bit further, since it is his bot that does the updating for the list. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

When to resubmit MethBase wiki page
Hi there,

I received an email from HasteurBot saying that because there have been no edits for 6 months on my submitted page, MethBase, it would be deleted if it was not either resubmitted for review or edited. The main reason for rejection the first time was because we were too new a database, but we have gone from 1 to 6 citations on google scholar and have a broad userbase. Is there a particular guideline for how many third party citations are required before acceptance? I don't want to resubmit if it is not yet relevant, and another comment on the draft page suggested that we keep it in draft space until it is deemed notable enough. I modeled our page after another methylation database page, NGSmethDB, and linked to them as well.

Let me know, thank you!

Ben

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MethBase — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin decato (talk • contribs) 08:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay in this, but you can resubmit it again whenever you want. There is no guideline of which to speak, but you want to have significant third-party citations if you're talking about a rather new company. I hope this helps! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Would you have any suggestions?
A few months ago during the eventually unsuccessful Requests_for_adminship/Piotrus_3 you voted "oppose". I wonder if you'd like to discuss any concerns of yours, or if you would have any suggestions in the event I'd decide to run again (which I am not planning to do anytime soon, but might consider in the future). I understand your concerns about canvassing, and I hope I understand that policy better now - I would be more than happy to chat about it if you'd like to query me on it now. For a better sense of my work and activities around the project, I invite you to consider reviewing my userpage, my talk page archives (which are not redacted), to watchlist my talk page, or use edit analysis tools like Wikichecker, content.paragr, dewkin, xtools-pages or xtools-ec (which in theory should work as of late 2014...). Thank you for your time, (PS. If you reply here, I'd appreciate a WP:ECHO or talkback ping).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * No thoughts at all? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

What the hell?
Why in the hell would you butcher an article while it's on the main page and right after a featured article review? There is no reason to split that article and I just finished merging them two months ago. What are you thinking?--v/r - TP 21:27, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll respond on the talk page, just to keep things in one place. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:42, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!
--Jakob (talk)  01:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laurie Auditorium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charlotte M. Crabtree House


A tag has been placed on Charlotte M. Crabtree House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alden C. Brett House


A tag has been placed on Alden C. Brett House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander E. Cance House


A tag has been placed on Alexander E. Cance House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna M. Johnson House


A tag has been placed on Anna M. Johnson House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Calvin Coolidge Tower


A tag has been placed on Calvin Coolidge Tower requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Grayson House


A tag has been placed on David Grayson House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 12:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Calvin Coolidge Tower


The article Calvin Coolidge Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alden C. Brett House


The article Alden C. Brett House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Grayson House


The article David Grayson House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edward M. Lewis House


The article Edward M. Lewis House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edwin D. Gorman House


The article Edwin D. Gorman House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth McNamara House


The article Elizabeth McNamara House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emily E. Dickinson House


The article Emily E. Dickinson House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eugene Field House (Amherst, Massachusetts)


The article Eugene Field House (Amherst, Massachusetts) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable dormitory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Washington Tower


The article George Washington Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guy C. Crampton House


The article Guy C. Crampton House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Helen Knowlton House


The article Helen Knowlton House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry D. Brown House


The article Henry D. Brown House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hugh P. Baker House


The article Hugh P. Baker House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James C. Greenough House


The article James C. Greenough House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Adams Tower


The article John Adams Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John F. Kennedy Tower


The article John F. Kennedy Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Quincy Adams Tower


The article John Quincy Adams Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kenyon L. Butterfield House


The article Kenyon L. Butterfield House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lottie A. Leach House


The article Lottie A. Leach House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Margaret Hamlin House


The article Margaret Hamlin House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mary M. Lyon House


The article Mary M. Lyon House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Minnie E. Dwight House


The article Minnie E. Dwight House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noah Webster House (Amherst, Massachusetts)


The article Noah Webster House (Amherst, Massachusetts) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul A. Chadbourne House


The article Paul A. Chadbourne House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ralph A. Van Meter House


The article Ralph A. Van Meter House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ralph Waldo Emerson House (Amherst, Massachusetts)


The article Ralph Waldo Emerson House (Amherst, Massachusetts) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roscoe W. Thatcher House


The article Roscoe W. Thatcher House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dormitory fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I appreciate your thanks for my edit about submarines built by Fore River Shipyard. It was a surprise when I looked down from my paragraph to see the subject had already been addressed! Who would have thought that USS C-1 (SS-9) was launched a bit earlier than USS B-1 (SS-10)? I also looked up the story of the Japanese and Russian Holland-type submarines that Fore River was involved with, and added to the material on these.RobDuch (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of George Washington Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Washington Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Washington Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 22:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Proposed New England Revolution South Boston stadium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proposed New England Revolution South Boston stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Proposed New England Revolution South Boston stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of John F. Kennedy Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John F. Kennedy Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John F. Kennedy Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of John Adams Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Adams Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John F. Kennedy Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of John Quincy Adams Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Quincy Adams Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John F. Kennedy Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Calvin Coolidge Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calvin Coolidge Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John F. Kennedy Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Laurie Auditorium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurie Auditorium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laurie Auditorium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 07:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Charles Astley Fowler
Thank-you. Happy Christmas

Ndstead (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem, as I am glad to have helped! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Hello and thank you very much for your feedback. This is my first Wikipedia article and I have to apologise that I had not read the guidelines closely enough. I have done my best to address the issues you had mentioned in the reason for non-approval. Thank you again and have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konchok (talk • contribs) 04:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

revised (now properly cited) article for JERRY MASTERS
Hi Kevin,

I hope this message finds you doing well in the New Year. I recently submitted an article about a musician and recording engineer named Jerry Masters. You were kind enough to initially review the article for submission. It was declined on basis of not proper/not enough citation basis. I have worked hard to add the adequate number of references from various credible sources along with historic photography. There are now 9 cited sources pertaining to each paragraph.

I am a journalist and music business historian based in Alabama and some of my work covers the rich history of recording music arts and heritage in the South and this state in particular. Im a greenhorn novice as regards Wikipedia, so I appreciate your letting me know about the deficiency in citations being an issue. I was a bit lazy in dealing with a historical personage and sometimes I have to admit I get "tunnel vision" in writing about music and take for granted/assume that everyone has already heard of many of the people I write about. hahah. Sorry about that.

At any rate, I have got some solid citational references in there now, so at your convenience if you could let me know if all things look up to speed now for a re-submission, I'd greatly appreciate it. The newly edited/updated draft is saved in my sandbox for review.

I know you guys are busy, and I appreciate your volunteer work as a contributing editor to the Wikipedia cause. It's exciting to join the family. I hope that over time, I'll get more used to the process on submission.

best,

dkharrismusicwrites — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkharrismusicwrites (talk • contribs) 03:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That looks a lot better, as I am pondering writing more about Muscle Shoals in the future, once I figure out more of the history and am able to figure out the timeline a bit more. Good luck! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Hilliard Greene
 * added links pointing to Brian Morton and Richard Cook


 * Eglin Air Force Base Railroad
 * added a link pointing to Camp Polk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George N. Parks
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George N. Parks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abigail Adams House


The article Abigail Adams House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG without reliable independent sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:29, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry F. Hills House North


The article Henry F. Hills House North has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG without independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry F. Hills House South


The article Henry F. Hills House South has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG without independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarah L. Arnold House


The article Sarah L. Arnold House has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG without independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Southwest (North) Dormitory III


The article Southwest (North) Dormitory III has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG without independent sources. Building was not completed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Query
Why?  Jim Car ter  13:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Because they are not dead and are still quite active on the site. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * LOL :)  Jim Car ter  04:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:22:59, 10 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 75.141.236.112
Kevin, thank you for your review of Kent Philpott.

I respectfully disagree with your determination and I offer the following additional explanation in argument for this.

On myself, which is not part of the page. I was an atheist, and had no knowledge that the Jesus people Movement existed, let alone what an awakening was. I thought Billy Graham was misguided at best, having heard him once at a rally in South Africa. I am today one of the authorities on Operation Savannah - in particular the battle of Luso. Angola 1975/76 - a CIA operation to stop the advance of communism.

http://operationsavannah.com/preface

I publish web sites on various social issues, like energy efficiency - http://open4energy.com - and write on the use of chemicals in the dental industry. If you google the term "bischoff chemical dental" - you will see an article I wrote for the #1 publication to the dental industry.

After 25 years as an alcoholic, I was helped to get sober, and on 10th October 2001 accepted Jesus. Today I am a student of PTSD and alcoholism, in particular how AA and a spiritual awakening has changed the face of alcoholism. It was in researching the history of "awakenings" that I discovered the spiritual and historical importance of the Jesus People Movement" - It is my generation that are recognizing how drugs and alcohol, which were the medication for PTSD and the Emotional Injuries of the Vietnam war. Sadky, we are repeating teh same mistake, as we see 10 young people commit suicide every day as a result of trauma this past 10 years and the gulf war.

This wiki page, is much more to me that a history on Philpott. It is how we expose our younger generation to the past, and to not make the same mistakes.

Before I start adding more information (there are 100's of references that could be added) (I wanted to begin with quality and not quantity) here is why I believe that the Movement is an important event (it is referenced on Wiki) - Philpott meets the definition for a person of "note" - and the citations meet the standard for independent authority.

I will of course add more information, and as many more citations as you require. Although, looking at pages on other people of note. I have found the to be less complete, for a more minor event, for a person with a more minor role, and citation of more minor authority than a PHD study by the authority on the subject.

Eskridge published the book God's Family Forever. The appendix to the book is the reference material for his doctoral thesis on the movement. He is now the accepted authority on the Jesus people Movement. He is on staff at Wheaton College, has been since 1988.

He affirms the importance I attribute to the movement.

i) "was one of the most important American religious movements of the second half of the 20th century." ii) "is one of the formative powers that shaped American youth in the late 1960's and 1970's." iii) "Calvary Chapel (Chuck Smith) and the Vineyard churches trace their roots to the Jesus People Movement"

He states that Philpott as the person who introduced Christianity (what grew into the movement) to San Francisco. (citation made)

He further accredits Philpott as the person who preached the Gospel to Hoyt. Literally saved from the fire in the temple. Hoyt is in the late stages of releasing his book. I have interviewed Hoyt, who after being born again, together with Philpott went on to establish the communities that saved 1000's of young people from the drug culture and abuse that was taking place.

Hoyt, was drawn away, to be a founder of the "Children of God (http://www.vice.com/read/the-bizarre-and-terrifying-propaganda-art-of-the-children-of-god-666) - lost his family, and almost his life before seeing his error, and rebuilding his life.

Hoyt could be seen as #2 of the movement. I am planning to develop a page for him also when his book is released.

The citation I have placed to Eskridge is the most authoritative that can exist.

Eskridge wrote the forward to Philpott's memoir - Memoirs of a Jesus Freak - saying "Memoirs of a Jesus Freak is an important, first hand, reminiscence about those pivotal early days... helpful to scholars, pastors and lay people as they reflect on the past.

I offer that that the material in Philpott's memoir, although written by him, can be considered authoritative by the introduction from the subject authority.

The memoir includes photographs, accounts of the music, the preaching, the leaders, the communities and the cults that developed later.

I hope that you will reconsider, or let me know what additional information you require.

Alex

75.141.236.112 (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm still not seeing notability here, so feel free to re-submit it again and someone else can look at it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Mary Ann Rhodes (supercentenarian)
Hi Ktr101, I just wanted to let you know that I speedily deleted an article that you recently moved out of AfC, Mary Ann Rhodes (supercentenarian) by criteria G4, as Rhodes was deemed insufficiently notable for Wikipedia by consensus and a deletion debate and the new article did not address the concerns that were raised in the discussion. Wikipedia has had a lot of difficulty with longevity-related articles in the past that culminated in an Arbcom case, and there are still issues from time to time regarding such articles' adherence to Wikipedia's policies. In any case, I just wanted to leave a quick message, since I'm not in the habit of deleting things without some explanation. 00:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem, as I was completely unaware of that case until now and will remember it in the future when I am reviewing articles such as that! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Night Will Fall
Well done for creating the film's WP entry! My father (Leonard Berney, a Belsen liberator) appears in the film - hence my interest. I just tweeted you from @uptone.Johnalexwood (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem, and I am glad to have helped! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright infringements found on George N. Parks
Hi Kevin! My review for George N. Parks found at least two copyright infringements in the article. This needs to get fixed ASAP, or else I will have to not only quickfail the article but delete all possibly infringing content.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 21:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

the xkcd barnstar

 * Thanks, as I now feel a bit honored by this accomplishment! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

ITN for 2015 Mozambique funeral beer poisoning
-- Spencer T♦ C 06:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Woohookitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2015 Mozambique funeral beer poisoning, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 07:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George N. Parks
The article George N. Parks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George N. Parks for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alliance Global Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Global Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George N. Parks
The article George N. Parks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:George N. Parks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss India USA


A tag has been placed on Miss India USA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://missindiaflorida.weebly.com/uploads/2/7/8/8/27880907/miss_india_florida_2014_sponsorship_packet.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons
Can you please respond to several outstanding issues at your Wikimedia Commons talk page. Thanks in advance. Nick (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Alternately, you might want to refer them onto the WMF as further evidence of the serious dysfunction there (especially the bureaucrat springing to the defence of a globally banned editor, and publicly linking to private correspondence they've posted). Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Centre of Excellence for Operations in Confined and Shallow Waters
Dear Kevin, thank you for reviewing my article on the COE CSW. I added more references and literature and would be glad if you would look at it again and if you are happy accept it. Thank you! seabas57 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seabas57 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Reviewed, and thanks for your work! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Aero & Tech Nexth
Hello Ktr101 I see that you are dealing with issues involved with Aero & Tech Nexth, I appreciate you cant discuss your dealing but the person claiming to be the aircraft designer keeps removing cited material and adding marketing and unreferenced material. Its probably getting near the point where the article needs to be protected against these edits by somebody with clear conflict of interest. Some of the recent press clippings added by the user have not supported the claims made. It must be a simple thing for the owner/designer to update the company website or press releases and provide reliable references that can be verified. If they think anything is factual wrong but cited then it should be easy to bring them up on the article talk page or remove any unreferenced facts. It is in all are interests to get the best information and source we can find but patience gets a bit thin when we are at the point of disruptive editing. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I have actually gone ahead and responded to them right now, so I will let you know once they get back to me. I did send them a note that stated that they need to abide by the neutral point of view, so lets hope this fixes it. If not, I am fully-supportive of reverting the page back to what it was before they started. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Prader scale
Ha - thank you!! :) I'd actually forgotten about that article. I'll put a little work into cleaning it up and adding images, sources, etc. - A l is o n  ❤ 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem! I was cleaning through the Drafts namespace and clearing out some of the vandalism, when I came upon one of the few drafts that had hope. It looks good, and I cannot wait to see the finished product! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Stockton University
Please stop changing this until after the name change and the article move have gone through.Naraht (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Seeing as they are renaming tonight, I am planning on moving it soon. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

re The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey: Not sure if that is the best way to carry out that change, but if you are very sure about this then okay.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 04:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * As I'm going to move it soon, I just decided to create the conflicts now and move it soon to fix them, since I don't want to have a bunch of double redirects occurring during the day in its main timezone. At this point, all I need to do is move and format the main page, which will happen soon. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Stockton
I hope you didn't go and revert everything that you have changed in regards to the Stockton University, as that was not my intent. As I mentioned on the college talk page, it is much appreciated and makes since to do so. It was just the main article that I didn't think needed changed, but decided that it makes more since after I heard your thoughts on it. I also said that because I don't know much about categories, that was on thing I was glad you did! I did revert my edit on the main article, which you can revert if you think otherwise. Have a good day.  Corkythehornetfan  |  Chat?  05:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, I actually went right to be after that, but I wanted to make sure that didn't happen so I left a note there saying just that. I'll be sure to monitor their communications pages tonight to see when they rename, although I won't object if you move it first. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay... the university has already updated the website so the page can be moved. I'll update the logos, as well. What else needs updated?  Corkythehornetfan  |  Chat?  22:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I moved the logos last night, but I think the only thing that needs fixing is the double redirects, and making sure that no other pages are going to have issues in terms of grammar. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Bots should fix the double redirects, right? I'll look to see what other pages link to RSCofNJ.  Corkythehornetfan  |  Chat?  22:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * They can, or you can just go through and revert my edits from last night, and set it so that there are no double redirects going on. In terms of the other pages, you might be able to set up AutoWikiBrowser to have another run if you have access to that, as that is how I made the majority of my edits during the first run. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have access to the AWB and by looking at the page, I don't think it works with Safari... Thanks for the suggestion, though! As for the SU articles, I think I've got a majority of it done. Thanks for the help and head start yesterday!  Corkythehornetfan  |  Chat?  00:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem, and I am glad to make the school less of a mouthful for people to say! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Walkendorff declined
Dear Ktr101,

I am just starting out as a contributor on Wikipedia, so please bear with me. You recently declined the page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Walkendorff. I am in fact attempting to translate the existing article about this family on the Swedish Wikipedia article, available at https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walkendorff.

I realise now that perhaps I should have created a stub article and then tag it with a translation template, as outlined here? The content and references used would be taken from the original Swedish page.

I would be much grateful for any advice. Perpetual Tourist (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Keepers of the Streak
Hello! Your submission of Keepers of the Streak at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Waterparks draft
Is there anything public you can point me at with respect to the "paid editing debacle" you mention here? And will you be offended if the G13 tag and your decline remain deleted when I history merge this draft with the other one and the version in mainspace? (They're the only two interleaved edits.) &mdash;Cryptic 01:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Essentially, one company created the draft, another editor who impersonated one an administrator offered to create the article, and then charged the company to build the same article using the draft. I don't know if they went through with it, but I am going to assume that the editor (who also sent information to another company), is a paid editor and a checkuser should eventually be run for the user. Go ahead and merge them though, as I will not object. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Borghild Project
Create job in adding the hoax part. I was completely unaware of that. I intend to do a GA-expansion and improvement of the article. I'll let you know when I'm done if you wish to do some copyedits or add something. Best, Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 17:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem, as I actually started to write it as a fact, and then started to find the hoax part and decided to fully flesh-out the text, to make it more substantial. Let me know when you start the process as well, as I found a good amount of text online and really only skimmed it when writing the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.flickr.com/photos/freg/6212859330/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Valhalla train crash
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 23:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

New train derailment
You originally created the 2015 Mount Carbon train derailment article, which I have collaborated on. Now, this was a major, new accident. Want to collaborate with me on a new article? "A BNSF oil train derails in a rural area near Galena, Illinois. Twenty-one of the 105 cars, containing Bakken formation crude oil, leave the track and catch fire, which continues to burn. No injuries are reported. ref: cite web|url=http://news.yahoo.com/train-carrying-bakken-crude-derails-burns-illinois-062821405.html|title=Railway now says 21 cars derailed from oil train in Illnois|work=Yahoo! News |publisher= |date= 6 March 2015 |accessdate=6 March 2015" (quoted ref, minus brackets)Juneau Mike (talk) 02:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey ! I have gone ahead and created the article here, so feel free to expand upon it when you have a moment! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I did some house keeping on the article, mostly to its title, and to the categories. I had to make a small "move" because there is only one "L" in Galena. I am going to wait a day or two and let others expand on the article before I jump. I don't want to hog the page lol. :) Let me know when you jump in. Thanks! Juneau Mike (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

2015 Gallena train derailment
Yes, lets collaborate on this. It should get expanded right away, or it will draw the AfD PD. I've done some light house keeping, but the prose is very elementary. Lets get this done! :) Juneau Mike (talk) 06:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

New article I created today
2015 Halifax train crash I know you will be busy with 2015 Galena train derailment, which you created, but take a peak at "my" new article. Thanks Juneau Mike (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good, so keep up the good work! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Southwest (North) Dormitory III


The article Southwest (North) Dormitory III has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unbuilt college dorm. No outside sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Southwest (North) Dormitory III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southwest (North) Dormitory III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Southwest (North) Dormitory III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Borghild Project
Could you polish this article a bit so the nomination to proceed? Abyssal (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Bay Line Railroad
I wonder if you might weigh in at Talk:Bay Line Railroad? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 00:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Keepers of the Streak
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for voting!
Thank you for voting on the Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525 debate whether Andreas Lubitz should merge with Germanwings Flight 9525. By the way, your talk page is epic!  CookieMonster755   (talk)   21:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Cape Cod Road Transportation
Cape Cod Road Transportation has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to comment at the discussion.  Imzadi 1979  →   11:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Battle for Outpost Vegas DYK Nomination
Hello, I changed the dyk/article according to your review. Is it good by your book? Thanks, Jdanbeck (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Rv of move during an open WP:RM
I have reverted you move of the article Aston Science Park to Birmingham Science Park Aston because there is an open RM on the talk page see talk:Aston Science Park. The appropriate thing to do is express you support for a move there, with the alternative title to which you moved the article, if you think that appropriate. -- PBS (talk) 16:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I only moved it due to a requested move from an OTRS ticket. Having never encountered anyone contesting a move before, I went ahead and moved it, so I have no problem if there is a discussion and you want to do it that way. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries. I did not even know that there was such a mechanism for requesting moves, as they normally go through WP:RM either as an uncontested or contested move. In point of fact as there is no other science park in Birmingham there seems little point appending Aston to the article title if the name is to be changed.-- PBS (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hyannis Fire Department


The article Hyannis Fire Department has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barnstable Fire Department


The article Barnstable Fire Department has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Fire Department


The article Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Fire Department has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cotuit Fire Department


The article Cotuit Fire Department has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of West Barnstable Fire Department


The article West Barnstable Fire Department has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:John B. Tsu/Temp
Hello, just so you know, this was not the right way to resolve a page that has been blanked for copyright investigation. The author was re-writing it on the Temp page of course, but once done the temp page must be histmerged into the main article, not copy/pasted in with the Temp page blanked-redirected. Copy/pasting it as was done here loses all the attribution for the editing that the author had done on the temp page (required by our license), and that edit has now been attributed to you. I'll see about fixing the history. Thanks, Crow  Caw  20:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * My apologies, as I was under the impression that as long as the same person wrote the page, there would be no issues copying and pasting it. Thanks for fixing the issue though, as it is greatly appreciated. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

CSD
Hi Ktr101, Just to let you know I've CSD'd Summa Western Reserve Hospital under A7 (For some daft reason Twinkle didn't notify you so thought I should quickly let you know..) Thanks and Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 22:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Maia Weinstock for speedy deletion
I have added a speedy deletion tag to Maia Weinstock. I am sure she is very nice, but I fail to see how she would be notable beyond meta-Wikipedia affairs.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maia Weinstock


The article Maia Weinstock has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Trifling notability. Fails WP:BLP1E and therefore fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 19:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Maia Weinstock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maia Weinstock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maia Weinstock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 22:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Borghild Project
Hello! Your submission of Borghild Project at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fire districts in Barnstable, Massachusetts for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fire districts in Barnstable, Massachusetts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fire districts in Barnstable, Massachusetts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Barnstable Police Department for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barnstable Police Department is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barnstable Police Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maia Weinstock
Hello! Your submission of Maia Weinstock at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2015 Frankford, Philadelphia train derailment


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2015 Frankford, Philadelphia train derailment. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – May 2015 Amtrak derailment. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at May 2015 Amtrak derailment – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Maia Weinstock
Harrias talk 20:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Thanks, as I certainly need it! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 13:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Just so you know ...
The reason the month was used in the title of what you have now moved to 2013 Spuyten Duyvil derailment was that, as noted on the talk page, there had been another derailment, of a freight train, near the same site earlier that year. So there hadn't been "only one". This is why, before you get the idea to be bold and change something that doesn't appear to make sense, you should look around and see if there wasn't some good reason for it in the first place.

Now, of course, we had left the article title that way because we thought we might create July 2013 Spuyten Duyvil derailment eventually. But almost a year and a half later, we still haven't, so in that respect I don't blame you because it was on us to create the other article and we never did. So I shall do so in the near future, and then restore the other article's original title. Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Белорусская лесная компания & Раф-кофе Comment
Hi Ktr101,

With regard to the above articles, I have reverted your edit because a foreign article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion (see WP:A2). Usually these articles requires the tag to see if anyone would be interested to translate the particular article. These articles would only be deleted after 2 weeks and even so requires a nomination for deletion.

That being said, I have checked the respective Copyvios reports and confirmed that above articles are copied from individual websites (CSD G12). I have updated the CSD tags for the articles now.

Hope that's fine. - Andrew Y talk 13:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries, as I figured that something was up with the articles. Thanks for catching that, and I will remember it next time! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 13:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Re-reverting
I am going to revert this edit. None of these articles should exist, I simply didn't have the interest to do all the work. None of these meet GNG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 23:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I mean, there are thirteen articles in the corresponding category, but I will not fight you on that since I am sure others might have an opinion as well on that. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 Accra explosion
The 2015 Accra explosion killed more people (200) than the Accra Sports Stadium disaster (127), therefore it appeared incorrect to say it was the worst disaster 'since' then as it was a worse disaster. As a result I removed this and you have now readded it. Sorry if I was not being clear. Rubbish computer 17:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * That works for me, and thank you for clarifying that issue! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

No problem! Rubbish computer 15:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Borghild Project
It's a shame this couldn't be saved for DYK. You may want to give a go at finding more sources for the article itself, but if you can't, then you need to think about whether this is really notable. If you decide not, you may be able to nominate it under WP:G7 and save a deletion discussion. EEng (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge
Hello! Your submission of Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ RobTalk 09:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Nomination currently lacks a valid hook; please supply a new one as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

MBTA station stubs

 * Hullo there! I've been thinking that this might be a good time to elevate your five userspace drafts of the MBTA's former Charlestown Elevated and Washington Street Elevated stations to full article status, what with the creation of WikiProject Greater Boston Public Transit and all.

The pages in question are:


 * User:Ktr101/City Square (MBTA station)
 * User:Ktr101/Thompson Square (MBTA station)
 * User:Ktr101/Dover (MBTA station)
 * User:Ktr101/Northampton (MBTA station)
 * User:Ktr101/Egleston (MBTA station)

Don't worry about them being stubs - they'll grow, and they'll do so faster in the main article space than as userspace drafts. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty &#124; Averted crashes 17:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you want to go ahead and expand them, go ahead, but I lack the sources to do so and was going to let another editor do it for me. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Fenway Park


The article New Fenway Park has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * More extensive coverage of this topic already exists in the Fenway Park article. As a cancelled project, there's never going to be any sort of detail available to the point of creating a quality article. MSJapan (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MSJapan (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of New Fenway Park for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Fenway Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New Fenway Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 01:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Uaat Vandalism
Hi, I notice this user user:Uaat always engage in lot of edit war. also Vandalism some article about Taiwan/Republic of China, please stop this guy, thanks. Цзинго (talk) 11:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited "Mammy memorial", you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Massachusetts Avenue and Mammy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sagami General Depot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stars and Stripes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Orangemoody
Something to look at is that many of the "gnoming" accounts insert a phrase "it's class is insecta " to relevant articles. Note the grammar. Maybe someone who can run AWB might want to go through and fix those. There are also a huge number of inappropriate insertions that should probably be cleaned up, as well as bad internal linking. Risker (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That is something that I noted as well, but I suppose I can go back in and fix them from now on, especially since many of the additions were added in over multiple edits, which makes it near impossible to individually revert them. I'll go leave a note on the AWB board though, to see if anyone wants to help out over there. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Union Pacific Railroad page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=679963453 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F679963453%7CUnion Pacific Railroad%5D%5D Ask for help])

List of historic Properties of Phoenix
Listen, why do you insist in adding this non existing link: Historic Old Phoenix City Hall? Create the article and then link it if you wish. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no rule that says that I have to immediately create the link the second I link to the article, as I have been busy doing other things in the meantime that have more importance in my life. The site even encourages red links, to show people than an article can be created and to encourage people to do so, but I also know that this page is an exception. Regardless, I plan on creating it today. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Right on Kevin. You did an excellent job. By the way, let me tell you that your work in Wikipedia is greatly appreciated. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, as it is greatly appreciated. Also, I created an article for the Phoenix freeway shootings if you want to add to that, although I am holding off now since there is so much speculation out there. 05:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeff Mellinger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Mellinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeff Mellinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Bwmoll3's old work
Thanks for your message Kevin. I appreciate you contacting me. However I actually cannot agree with what you propose; as Moonriddengirl tries so hard to make clear so often, we really face a major copyright liability - which could threaten the site's very existence if left unaddressed. Therefore when I find clearly dubious articles of Brent's, I am going to put them through the deletion process. It's just so sad that he did all this hard work and didn't take the time to mix his sources more, put things in his own words, and reference them!! Again thanks for dropping me a line. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe I wrote that and did not make sense, but essentially what I meant is that we would leave things so bare bones, that the articles would just have templates, a basic sentence or two, and maybe an infobox left. What would be left would just say it exists (or existed), and have links to other things for people to add back in material that is cited. I definitely agree that all offending text should be purged, but I think if we could at least save the articles so that they are bare skeletons that can be improved upon, it might be easier for someone to improve it later on in the future. I already have added back in two articles by this method, and made sure that everything that could possibly be of issue was removed, because I believe in being overly cautious about this whenever possible. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

497th Combat Training Flight
I don't see anything to suggest this unit has been returned to squadron size. Although I can find post 2006 web pages referring to it as a squadron, they tend to predate the AFHRA Factsheet of May 2011, which affirms it is a flight.

At any rate, appears to have been redesignated seems more appropriate for a section on the talk page, not a move of the page. I believe the flight to squadron changes should be reverted. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You're right, as the online sources I used were rather sketchy. Regardless, I have gone ahead and moved it back for you. Also, I created the 54th Helicopter Squadron earlier today, if you want to work on that. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll add a lineage to the 54th. By the way [evil, unciteable]  primary sources indicate the 497th was not redesignated between 2006 an 2011, so if it happened, it had to be later than that.  And a   --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 69th Bomb Squadron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Flag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)