User talk:Ktrachsel01/Evaluate an Article

Feedback
Wow, that "Talk" page got heated! A very interesting read.

A couple of observations -- you mention the graphs -- I notice an error either in the graph or the text that accompanies it in the "Ranking" section -- the info doesn't match. The graph doesn't indicate a year for those rankings, so it's unknown which one is more or less recent.

The other useful observation from the "Talk" page that caught my eye is that the article (except for the content about the recent controversy) is, in their words, "overly promotional" -- much of the article reads like our Marketing department wrote it. Definitely some of it should be brought to a more neutral POV, and the section headers made more accurate (for example the section whose title highlights new publications, more of the text in that section is about construction of new buildings vs. publications) Clund07 (talk) 03:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)