User talk:Kubrick379

Welcome!
Hello, Kubrick379, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Chillum 01:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Blue Velvet
I won't revert the article again until there's been a discussion, but can you please contribute the genre discussion on Blue Velvet's talk page? In general, it's messy to list more than one genre in the header, and I also balk at calling it neo-noir as that genre seems to be slapped on any film on Wikipedia with the slightest noir influence. Specifically for Blue Velvet, I don't feel the genre has been established other than those are the two genres you personally feel the film belongs to. I feel uncomfortable slapping Blue Velvet with any genre label because it touches on so many different things. It's a film that changes genre from scene-to-scene. To me, the most accurate and objective thing to do would be to say "it's been viewed as some critics as being this genre, others as being that genre, it uses elements from noir and is considered by many critics to be part of the neo-noir movement, and also draws on experimental cinema, surrealism, horror, satire," etc in the article. I'd be okay with just calling it a mystery film because the AFI considers it that if we absolutely must name a genre in the very first sentence. But can we keep it to one? If we say "it's a neo-noir mystery," someone's going to come along wanting to add another genre and they'll be able to cite, then another, and another, and eventually you're going to have five or ten genres in the opening sentence as I've seen in many film articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.55.61.161 (talk) 08:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please stop edit warring on the The Searchers (film) article. Your contribution was a clear duplication of information already contained within the article and was re-inserted without any explanation and mention on the article Talk page. Your "edits" have now been reversed by two editors and if you continue, you may find yourself blocked from editing. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

New Hollywood
You have twice restored unsourced information to New Hollywood which is contrary to WP:BURDEN, which clearly states "''The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution ... Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source."

Your behavior on this article is disruptive and you are having a negative effect on the article, effectively damaging it by adding unsubstantiated claims. If you continue in this manner I will request administrator intervention. Betty Logan (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Discussion
I would like to discuss about something here.

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of film director and composer collaborations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Sky. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)