User talk:Kuebie

May 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pure blood theory in Korea. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 11:33, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * You have been mentioned in an incident at Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 11:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you're familiar with our policy on edit warring at this point; move warring is even more annoying. Since this is roughly your fifth block for this behavior, I've set the block for a month.   Kuru   (talk)  16:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I needed a break anyway. Off to listen to Goblin. Kuebie (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Joseon Dynasty. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Quigley (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Wikiquette alerts
Hello, Kuebie. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. &mdash;Bill Price (nyb) 14:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pure blood theory in Korea. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Quigley (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Please self-revert, as you've not thoroughly discussed the changes you wanted to make to this controversial article. I created a talk page section for you to explain your blanking of large amounts of information and to remake them into proposals that consensus can rally around. Quigley (talk) 03:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Long-term edit warring and POV pushing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The report is now archived at Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive165. --Kusunose 10:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)