User talk:Kuhle

Mattias kuhle
A tag has been placed on Mattias kuhle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Mattias kuhle and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 12:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Matthias Kuhle
A tag has been placed on Matthias Kuhle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome and Conflict of Interest
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

You should review our Conflict of Interest policy/guideline, as well as our policies and guidelines around  notability and WP:V Verifiability. There are also some good pages about creationg your first article you may wish to have look at. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

advice
As reviewing administrator, I think the subject of the article clearly indicates notability, and thus cannot be deleted via speedy. Please see WP:CSD for the criteria -- I think he almost certain does meet it, and will thus pass AfD if challenged. We do not delete articles for COI, though its true that its difficult to write one's own autobiography in an encyclopedic way. The article reads however like a resume, not an encyclopedic article, and needs to b written to be really acceptable here. I would advise first reading our Business FAQ (which also applies to articles like this, and then making sure that nothing on the page is copied from your web site--it if is any you want to use it, follow the directions at the FAQ mentioned. And, in particular take note that there is, very unfortunately, some prejudice here against even important people from the academic world. if you would like the article to remain you must write it in the WP style, which includes: Do this and there should be no trouble. But please be aware of our conventions--see  our guide to writing Wikipedia articles.DGG (talk) 15:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * looking like an encyclopedia article not a CV
 * saying in the first sentence something to dramatically demonstrate notability, like "A.b. is an internationally-known professor of X at, winner of the XYZ prize and 10 honorary doctorates", or A.B. is a notable authority on Whatever. She is ... (etc) (whatever applies best). Use the exact wording I recommend, including either the word "notable" or "internationally-known" or "nationally-known"; do not use "famous" -- May sound silly, but that is what many people look for here.
 * listing college degrees with university and year -- and putting the university names in double brackets
 * listing important awards, important memberships and offices held --a list is more readable than paragraphs
 * If editor of any journal, say so.
 * listing books published as formal references style: Author, title, Publisher, year ISBN if possible.
 * listing some major published papers, say how many total. Do not just link to Google, list the most prestigious papers. State the importance the journals are. Say how many other papers cited them. Use PubMed, not Google or Google Scholar. --Pub Med covers this field better.
 * and, most important, giving some 3rd party sources. A website at a university etc. can be one, but it cannot be the only one. Book reviews are fine, or newspaper stories about an award. Campus student newspapers are generally not OK. Print or web is OK, but not from a list or a blog.