User talk:Kulathuvayal

File copyright problem with File:Kulathuvayal Forane Church.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Kulathuvayal Forane Church.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar.
A tag has been placed on Dr. W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Dr. W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar., a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Dr. W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar.. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 01:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Dr. W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar.. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Zhang He (talk) 01:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I've removed the speedy deletion tag: however, the article needs to demonstrate his WP:NOTABILITY above and beyond simply being an academic (which is not enough). I'd recommend you add content on some of his publications, and any reviews his written work may have received. good luck, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar.. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Anna Lincoln  10:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Your vandalism at Kulathuvayal‎
Your recent edits to the article Kulathuvayal‎ are obviously vandalistic. Pls refrain from such acts in the future. I understand you have been warned earlier by editors for the same reason. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Arjun 024  10:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)