User talk:Kuldeep Bais

November 2018
Hello. Some of your recent changes, such as the one you made to Naveen Jindal, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content, as you did to Naveen Jindal, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Such changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Naveen Jindal. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zinnober9 (talk) 08:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.