User talk:Kulfikaju

November 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Puneet Vashist. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ch an  de r  14:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

none of the sentences are sourced on that page, so how am i vandalising?? Kulfikaju (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Unexplained deletion
Hello, I'm Ponyo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gautam Gulati without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of content
Hi there, you have twice removed content from the lead section of Hate Story 3 without providing a sufficient explanation. The information being presented, i.e. the year, the nationality, the language (if relevant, which in Indian cinema, it is), format (like "animation" if relevant) and the genres are standard content that should be included in the article's lead. Note Jurassic World, Furious 7, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Minions (film), and Inside Out (2015 film) for example. Please don't remove this content without seeking a local consensus via discussion on the article's talk page. And in the future if you notice that content that you've submitted or changed has been reverted, please open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the change, rather than resubmitting it. See WP:BRD. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Hate Story 3. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Diff: Improper removal of Estimation template, which should be included per consensus at WP:ICTF. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Archive 5'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hate Story 3. ''Diff: You keep removing the language from the lead without any explanation or rationale in established guidelines. In this edit you also inexplicably change genres without providing a reference for your changes. Since genre is subjective, it needs to be sourced, since we are not interested in users' personal opinions.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)