User talk:Kulturkampf 1872

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Kulturkampf 1872! Your additions to Martin Bormann have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your editing
Hi. I've recently reverted a significant number of your edits, for a variety of reasons. I presume, given the editing pattern, that you previously edited without an account as User:31.215.182.134, where you were blocked for 72 hours as a result of disruptive editing. You're on a pretty certain path to being blocked again, perhaps for longer. You need to stop making unexplained or unjustified edits to articles, and you must not use misleading edit summaries, as you did here, where you purported to add a category but actually removed a more precise category that related to the fact that the persecution was perpetrated by the Nazis. Your editing pattern appears to be designed to very subtly shift the conceptualisation of persecution away from "Nazis persecuting Catholics" to "German people opposed to the structures and clergy of the Catholic church", but you do so without regard to reliable sources, and without giving any real justification for your edits. I suggest you consider whether you are prepared to edit in a way that is designed to build an encyclopaedia because at the moment you're heading down a one-way street to being blocked. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 11:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, this editor seems to believe that the Nazis did not persecute Catholic, and has been actively substituting other language for "persecution". I agree with Ninetyone above that their editing is heading in the direction of being blocked for disruption if they don't stop making these clearly PoV changes. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Macedonian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Julian (emperor) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Macedonian (talk) 06:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Richard Wagner. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Given that your edit suggested Wagner was baptised a Roman Catholic in a Church that had been Lutheran for 300 years, I can only assume you are now deliberately introducing falsehoods as part of your campaign. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 21:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Take a look at your editing
Take a look at your contributions list:. Now take a look at your contributions list when you were editing as 31.215.182.134:.

You should note that the majority of your edits, both now and earlier, have been reverted by other editors. That means something -- it means that your edits are not improving the articles you make them to, for various reasons, and other editors see that and revert them.

That's something you need to change. If the majority of your edits are being reverted then you are somehow on the wrong track and need to alter how you are editing, because continuing to edit as you are is inevitably going to lead to your being blocked from editing.

Also, you cannot continue to ignore the warnings and comments on your talk page, such as this one. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and WP:Communication is required of all editors. If you do not communicate, again, you are very likely to be blocked from editing in the future.

You really need to make an effort to change these things if you wish to continue to contribute to Wikipedia. If you'd like some advice, I'd suggest that you go to WP:Teahouse and ask the folks there for help in correcting your problems. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Using multiple accounts
Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 09:44, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julian (emperor). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Macedonian (talk) 06:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Categories *must* be supported by information in articles
You've been told this before, when you were editing as an IP, that you cannot add categories to an article if the category is not directly supported by information in the article. You cannot, for instance, add a category saying someone was a Lutheran because their father was a Lutheran, the article must say explicitly that the subject was a Lutheran.

You must stop doing this, or it i inevitable that you will be blocked from editing in the future, especially considering the other warnings and notices on your talk page, and your complete lack of response to them. See WP:Communication is required. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Template:Nazism sidebar
Twice, now, you have changed the image on this sidebar. I informed you the first time that the image and its size were the result of a extended consensus discussion, which you will find here, but you went and changed it again anyway. Once a community consensus has been reached, it can only be overturned with a new consensus, which must be reached with a formal discussion. If you want to change the image or its size, you must start a discussion about doing so on the template talk page and received a consensus to do so. Without it, your edits are disruptive, as you are editing against consensus.

I hope that is clear. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Adding unsupported categories
You've been told a number of times that you must not add categories to articles that are not supported by any evidence in the article itself, and yet you continue to add categories about a subject's religion when there is no mention of their religious beliefs in the article. ' You must stop doing this. '

The next instance of your adding an unsupported category will be reported to administrators for adjudication.

Further, you have not responded to any of the warnings and notices which have been placed on this talk page by other editors. I suggest that you read the Wikipedia  policy  WP:Communication is required. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and collaboration is not possible if one editor refuses to enter into discussions with other editors who have concerns about their editing.  Please note that editors have been blocked from editing simply for not communicating . If you don't want to take the risk of being blocked, I would advise you to start to respond to these kinds of warnings. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)