User talk:Kumagoro-42

RE:edits to Futurama and Amy Wong
Sorry you're having some stress about editing. I had a look at the specific edits you made and I think the reason both were undone was because of your descriptions of Amy as "hot". The key item to remember is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and we have to keep our own thoughts and opinions out of it. That being said, descriptions such "hot" and "beautiful" about animated characters tend to strike other editors as representing a single person's point of view, not everyone will think an animated character should be described that way. All I can advise is to keep trying and consider reading some articles listed at WP:FA, articles which have been identified as the best on Wikipedia, to see what is expected and to get some ideas of how to improve the current articles. If you feel like you have an important addition to an article and you find that it is being reverted consistently then consider discussing it on the article's talk page and get some opinions on why it is being deleted and how it could be improved. Good luck and let me know if you need any help with specific issues! Stardust8212 02:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

RE:edits to Futurama and Amy Wong
Hello, thanks for your answer. I perfectly understand that is crucial to not show gratuitos personal opinions in someone's article (that is true for Wikipedia, but also for all serious journalist works). The point is: these adjectives doesn't reflect my point of view on both Amy and Leela, but the creators' point of view, as being explicited many times during audio commentaries (I can provide direct quote, if you feel they will be needed). The fact that Futurama includes some female characters intentionally depicted as very attractive in a way (although with "quirks", i.e. Leela's monocular eye, etc.) is a peculiar feature of the show. Maybe I choosed the wrong adjectives, but I wanted to fix what I feel as a decriptive lack: someway I feel that these characters presentations is too much "asexuated", and do not reflect one of the aspect of their intended design and personalities. Other than that, the fact that Fry is constantly seeking to being loved by Leela through the show (leading to much appreciated episodes such as "Parasite Lost"), is a dominant fact for the character, as well as the fact that Leela would be all in all a very attractive woman if not for her unique eye. These elements are left out the description, and I thinks that's a very wrong and unbalanced way to look at the characters. Last, why professor Farnsworth is not meant to be decribed as an "absent-minded" man, a trait he always show in all the episodes? I feel these descriptions concentrate over all the secondary elements and don't catch some of the main elements. Please let me know what you think about that. Do you think I should open a discussion about these matters? Kumagoro-42 03:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I think if you really feel these elements are lacking from the articles then it is best to bring it up on the respective talk pages. It is also best to find reliable, secondary sources which indicate that this is a significant aspect of the character (the Amy Wong page in particular is lacking in this regard). Stardust8212 03:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here. --User: (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Potential edit warring in When Marnie Was There
Hello, you're invited and express your views on Talk:When Marnie Was There. Jotamide (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of time travel science fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * My bad. Fixed it. Kumagoro-42 11:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Frears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chéri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kanchenjungha (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fernando Arrabal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Shannon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lost River (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vamps (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clueless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Hailee Steinfeld
 * added links pointing to John Carney and Daniel Barber


 * Mockumentary
 * added a link pointing to Drop Dead Gorgeous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hugh Perceval, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Fallen Idol and Night Beat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiptoes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Susan Barnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC) (Notification per WP:CAN.)

Trollhunter
In a recent edit to the page Trollhunter, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Indrek (talk) 11:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Warning
You have been reverted by two editors at Jennifer Lawrence. The proper course of action would be to invite discussion on the article talk page and determine consensus. To repeatedly revert to your version of the article is edit warring (see WP:Edit warring and BOLD, revert, discuss cycle). Violating this policy jeopardizes your editing privilege. It would be best if you self revert and begin a discussion on the article talk page.  Tide  rolls  00:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I already reverted and started a discussion in the editors' pages. Most of my edit was about mere fact-checking (wrong release dates, wrong links), being thrown away with choices they didn't agree upon and I'm discussing now. Kumagoro-42 00:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the I Know What You Did Last Summer plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Signature violating policy
Your signature should contain at least one link to your userpage or user talkpage. WP:SIGLINK is the relevant policy. You should change your custom signature to link to that or use the default signature. If you need help with that, just comment here as I'm watching this page. Galobtter (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brittany Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Brittany_Allen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Brittany_Allen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Better Call Saul
Hey there! There's a few BCS-related articles that need work at the moment such as Nacho Varga, Kim Wexler and Mike Ehrmantraut. I would be very obliged if you could give me a hand. Thanks. The Optimistic One (talk) 03:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, what kind of work? I won't be able to do much this week, though. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 04:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Nothing much for Kim, it just needs more content for the reception section and the biography needs to be trimmed. I'll be able to handle Mike, just need to add some plot information about Better Call Saul, Nacho's has no biography for the third season and like Kim, needs more content for the reception section. Thanks. The Optimistic One (talk) 05:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll give a look to Kim and Nacho later in the week. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 05:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! The Optimistic One (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry, I just realized I never did this in the end. I got sick right after that, and then forgot. The beginning of the new season reminded me. Did you manage to do the revisions yourself? I doubt I'll be able to do it now, too busy at work for the time being. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's fine. These problems have been sorted. No harsh feelings. The Optimistic One (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternity and a Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eternity_and_a_Day check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eternity_and_a_Day?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)