User talk:Kumar.bs4

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Veer Savarkar International Airport has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Veer Savarkar International Airport was changed by Kumar.bs4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863979 on 2013-07-16T13:18:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Scripts
Please stop adding scripts to article. Per WP:INDICSCRIPT, it was decided not to include any scripts in Indian articles. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. If you continue to add scripts, I'm gonna have to report you. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 14:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 14:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not doing any wrong here. I am editing as per consensus at the RFC (WP:INDICSCRIPT). You can't compare India to other countries. We have as many languages as Africa has as being a continent! It wasn't me alone who took the decision, the discussion went on for quite sometime on the pros and cons of using scripts in Indian articles. As of now, the consensus is to remove them from articles. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 15:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
I had to undo some of your edits as per MOS:FLAG. Your edit to Eastern Naval Command was fine, but others were not. Thanks, and happy editing! Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 21:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indira Gandhi Zoological Park ‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ''Please read as MOS:FLAG. Do not keep adding flag icons to articles that do not require it as per policy.'' Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 21:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)