User talk:Kumudpant

February 2014
Hello, I'm Soham. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bhoothnath Returns because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Soham 17:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bhoothnath Returns. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. ''Again. 15 mins of fame.'' —Soham 06:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumud pant


A tag has been placed on Kumud pant, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 22:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I noticed that you removed the speedy-deletion template, which conflicts with the instructions above. Editors use these templates to remove content that is inappropriate for Wikipedia. I happen to agree with the user above that the content on the page is not suitable for inclusion. Is there a reason why you removed the templates? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kumud pant


The article Kumud pant has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

You in JTHJ
I believe that you actually appeared in Jab Tak Hai Jaan, but I prefer you provide some reliable evidence for your appearance. To know what I mean, please read WP:RS. Until then, we cannot accept your original research. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kailash29792. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jab Tak Hai Jaan because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you really did appear in the film, please provide strong evidence. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Removal of talk page content.
Hi, please do not remove article talk page content as you did here. Article talk pages are to be used for discussing improvements to the article, not for pasting copyrighted content you wish to reuse. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumud Pant


A tag has been placed on Kumud Pant, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * My speedy deletion notes: I've nommed this article for speedy delete for the following reasons: No assertion of notability per general notability or the criteria at WP:ENTERTAINER, and for clear promotion with the following explanation: article creator appears to have WP:COI, as they both share the same name. Article reads like vanity project. Roles appearing in filmography are mostly incidental roles like "Man at bar", "Airport passenger" or "Gym exercise" [sic].


 * Further info: Article creator previously deleted an A1, A7, G11 speedy deletion nomination by here, without explanation or response to my query on his talk page. I nommed the article for PROD, but the user responded with those three references, at least two of which were insufficent.


 * Unrelated to speedy delete nom, contributor has not yet replied to talk page warnings or questions. Editor inexplicably deleted my comments on the talk page and pasted copy/vio interview instead. User may not have the linguistic skills to work here effectively (WP:COMPETENCE), may not know our rules, but also hasn't participated in discussion and seems to think Wikipedia is MySpace. Editor has removed the redlinks in these edits which I added to see if the films bluelinked. This suggests that the majority of the movies he has appeared in may not be notable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumud Pant


A tag has been placed on Kumud Pant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Articles for Creation
Hi, if you think that an article on Kumud Pant is warranted, you should probably go through the Articles for Creation process, as this will allow you more time to get the article up to speed with significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject and to establish the subject's notability. If you keep submitting the same old stuff, the article will continue to get deleted. You should probably take a look at Writing Your First Article. Also, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. If you remain silent when people contact you, it's going to look like you have an agenda and you will have a hard time editing here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumud Pant


A tag has been placed on Kumud Pant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyphoidbomb (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kumudpant/Kumud Pant


A tag has been placed on User:Kumudpant/Kumud Pant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5126893. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sum mer PhD (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Apparently you haven't read anything on this page. You weren't blocked for posting photos, you were blocked for using Wikipedia for spam and advertising. Articles are not "profiles" and not everyone in the world is entitled to one. This is an encyclopedia, not Myspace. It is unclear what will change if you are unblocked, since you seem to be here only for self-promotion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * HI I am still unsure due to what things it has been look used as for  spam  and advertising  I I will not put such things in future and if already put I wil reove as soon as possible thanks kumud
 * That's because you were more interested in resubmitting the Kumud Pant article than reading your talk page. Read THIS for the synopsis. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

HI i think due to i copy text from imdb and provide some of my profile related website i think you block  my page i thought there will not be any problem to copy text so want to say sorry for that can you unblock my restriction one time i will not repeat same problem again.

Sockpuppetry
Evading your block by creating a new account is not going to do your case for unblocking any favours. 08:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yunshui (talk • contribs)

what should and can do to unblock my acount please can you advice me i am really confuse about it thanks.