User talk:Kun7h14n N91n

Redirects
Is there some reason you are redirecting every possible spelling alternative of Kundian to the Pontinak, Indonesia page? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Typo redirect Kundhien
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kundhien, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kundhien is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kundhien, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Please do not redirect article space pages to user space or user talk space pages. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy, and such redirects will be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Rendy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rendy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 13:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with Image:Rendy2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rendy2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the image under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Image Use
Well, you could always just tag them for speedy deletion; that way, when admins like myself are making runs through the category and deleting pages, we can get through them. The reason you've seen these pages is probably because there are literally hundreds of thousands of them lying around; it takes a bit of time to get rid of them all. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D  18:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Rendy.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rendy.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Rendy2.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Rendy2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Khuntien Ngin for details. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Khuntien Ngin for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)