User talk:Kung Fu Man/archive7

GGC on 1RR
Hi there. The Gamergate controversy article, which you have recently edited, is under 1RR, which means an editor may not make more than one revert per 24 hours. A revert is defined by policy as "An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part". As such, I'd request the latest revert you made in which you changed the meaning of the sentence to be self reverted. Cheers! PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * And I assert PeterTheFourth that the sentence was not changed back to it's original content nor an approximation of such but instead one that compromises the content of the original sentence with your valid point that several of the commentators attributed the actions to Gamergate. Can you say that it doesn't in good faith compared to the original, sir?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In the spirit of compromise with your desire to reword my phrasing, I've again altered it. Tell me what you think! PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I would ask that we keep the 'additionally' part of the sentence as only two of the sources, not all four, are making that statement. I would also suggest removing 'misogynistic' as it feels both pointed and redundant given the note about women being harassed. Perhaps something more akin to this?
 * "Commentators noted this in light of the movement, with some additionally calling it a response by the video game industry to harassment attributed to Gamergate of prominent female figures."
 * I feel this keeps a much more neutral tone while echoing what the sources are saying here, without making it sound as if we the editors are making an accusation ourselves. Is this fair?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 08:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't believe 'in light of the movement' is descriptive at all. In light of Gamergate... existing? Additionally, 'misogynistic harassment of a female' is different to 'harassment of a female', hence my use of it as an adjective there. Much of Gamergate's harassment was related to the gender of those they targeted.
 * Would you clarify what you mean by 'in light of' Gamergate? PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well two of the sources are making no mention of harassment or otherwise, but instead noting that they feel it was taken into consideration for this year's E3 expo. While I can concede on misogynistic, I do feel making it clear these are actions attributed pulls the article away from making outright accusations itself which the current sentence seems to, especially light of sources such as this debate on the Huffington Post which acknowledges that there is question as to where some of such attacks may originate from.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 08:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * How would you feel about "Commentators felt that this was a response to Gamergate, some noting it as a rejection of the misogynistic harassment it perpetrated."? PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It still needs to made the Wikipedia article itself isn't making accusations but solely reflecting what's being said in these sources. 'attributed to it' is far more neutral than 'it perpetuated' and still gets the point you feel should be made across, does it not?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 08:53, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Describing the harassment isn't an accusation. That the Gamergate hashtag has been used for a harassment campaign is a fact widely reported in reliable sources, and described earlier in the article. PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * But it's also one questioned by a source such as above. Much of the article right now reads as if it's wikipedia's stance, and not that of its sources. I look at it like I did video game character articles: numerous sources could, say, call Ivy Valentine sexist. Other sources disagree. Neither are wrong here are the article merely states their opinions and attributions of those commenting as well as observing what the consensus is, not saying one way or another an absolute.
 * If the consensus amongst journalists is this harassment is attributed to Gamergate, the article should reflect that as *their* consensus and accusations, and not wikipedia's. As more sources come about consensus can and does change and new information becomes citable it's easier to work into it with such a tone. As it reads now...it feels less like it's an encyclopedic entry and more like it's making a point all its own.
 * And as someone that's been around a very long time, I'm deeply troubled by the idea of any wikipedia article taking such of stance, as you should be.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Honestly, at this point, it's approaching more of a general discussion on how Wikipedia should describe the harassment perpetrated by those who represent themselves with the Gamergate hashtag- do you mind if we move the discussion to the GGC talk page? PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think we should. I'm curious Masem's take on the subject myself.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 09:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I've started a section and pinged you to it. You're welcome to ping Masem as well, but I have no doubt that he'll be there regardless. PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Basically, the problem is that WP:3RR (which also applies to the 1RR) says that "An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." For example, the second of these two edits is another revert on your part, because you're deleting the text "...a series of logs from 4chan chat rooms and discussion boards indicated that the #NotYourShield hashtag was created on 4chan..." after someone reinstated it.  For the record, my objection to your removal of that part specifically was part of why I reverted that part of your edits myself; I think that it's central to what the source is saying. --Aquillion (talk) 02:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't agree that the mention earlier is sufficient; the preceding statement is just about one post, whereas the second paragraph makes it clear that the entire hashtag was created by users there (that, in other words, it was a 4chan op comparable to #EndFathersDay), not just that one random person there suggested it. Your revision lost that and therefore didn't accurately paraphrase the article.  Additionally, I noticed that while I was explaining how WP:3RR works, you reverted yet again by reinstating the reference to Georgina Young's opinion; since I removed that source, reinstating it (even with different wording) is another revert -- your third or fourth, depending.  You should self-revert that!  When someone objects to an edit on a controversial article like this, you should go to the talk page, not try to repeat your changes again and again with slightly different wording.  The bold, revert, discuss cycle is to discuss on talk when someone objects to (and reverts) an edit you made, basically. --Aquillion (talk) 03:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
Strongjam (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Transcript of HuffPostLive interview
A while ago, another GGer and I put together a transcript of the HuffPostLive interview you referenced recently, with timecodes for the questions and answers so you can verify the content: http://pastebin.com/Famvp4G0. I hope this might be helpful in some way. --Mracidglee (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I'll look it over and compile references from it.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Revert of your edit to Gamergate controversy
Sorry to do that! I understand what you were trying to do, but I think you went a bit far. Happy to discuss on the article talk page. Dumuzid (talk) 23:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

The Mary Sue as RS
Has, not surprisingly, been discussed before. Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_189?searchDepth=1#The_Mary_Sue_Disclaims_Itself_as_an_Unreliable_Source

This certainly doesn't mean it shouldn't be brought up again, but I thought that was useful background. Thanks. Dumuzid (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

New Source about GamerGate
Greetings, since I am under 500 edits for the gamergate talk section I wish for you to see ["Journalism is Dead - Article" by Chihiro Onitsuka]. Sorry for this roundabout way but a source from this website is highly notable and should be worthy of interest.(Really wish they lowered the edit restriction atleast, sigh) TheRealVordox (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Followup [Industry and Gamergate Analysis (Continued) - News by Chihiro Onitsuka]TheRealVordox (talk) 06:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Chihiro was a hoax. TheRealVordox (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Kung Fu Man!


Happy New Year! Kung Fu Man, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. DSA510   Pls No Bully 00:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Fashionably late as usual.

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:9-vivi-c.png
 Thanks for uploading File:9-vivi-c.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chris-brandt.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chris-brandt.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bullet-Proof Software


The article Bullet-Proof Software has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Wrong name
Hi, Kung Fu Man, I just noticed that you uploaded this image: Ash Williams in "Army of Darkness" (1992).jpg... but it appears, because I know (and recently re-watched) the Evil Dead trilogy, that this picture is taken from Evil Dead 2, not Army of Darkness. If you agree, we should launch the procedure to move the file from its current wrong name to a more correct name (for instance: Ash_Williams_in_"Evil_Dead_2:_Dead_by_Dawn"_(1987).jpg). Don't you agree with that? Kintaro (talk) 18:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nina-williams.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Nina-williams.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
 The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017

Previous issue | Index | Next issue 

Project At a Glance As of Q2 2017, the project has:


 * 211 Featured Articles
 * 70 Featured Lists
 * 11 Featured Topics
 * 1 Featured Portals


 * 28 Featured Pictures
 * 1,172 Good Articles
 * 23 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements


 * Feature: Shiny Wikipedians - A Featured Content Leaderboard
 * Feature: Final Fantasy VII postmortem

Project Navigation

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list. (Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

List of characters and locations from the Evil Dead series listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters and locations from the Evil Dead series. Since you had some involvement with the List of characters and locations from the Evil Dead series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Bayonetta-character.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bayonetta-character.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Re: Ivy Valentine Edits
Yeah, just been trying to clean up some of the stuff from Snaaake, Hanzo, whatever username you want to call the guy by. As you probably know, he inserted reams of stuff in these kinds of articles, mostly to the effect of "X female game character was named on Mad Hot Gaming Brazil's hottest jiggly bewbs on a polygonal game character in the 21st century" or some such frivolous stuff. Feel free to reintroduce some or all of this content of course, no worries. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I guess the reception section might need a revision to first focus on how she was received gameplay wise and design wise similar to Lars Alexandersson (who has info about his appearances and how he was received in each case). Few months ago I tried doing the same with Cloud Strife but I still think some paragraphs of its reception section are too much.Tintor2 (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Also, long time no see Kung Fu Man. Hope you are okay. Cheers.
 * : Ah that makes some sense now, yeah. I'll take a look through it and see about tightening it up, a lot of that stuff was written years ago and I know there are some new bits (one interview from the new SC in fact). Also good to see you guys still around, been holding up for the most part.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:SOUL listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SOUL. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:SOUL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — JFG talk 17:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazy-climber-flyer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crazy-climber-flyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)