User talk:KungfuMantis

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cladocroce has been accepted
 Cladocroce, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Cladocroce help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Duckstation (emulator)


The article Duckstation (emulator) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Woodroar (talk) 15:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * What's the problem and where can I fix it? KungfuMantis (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Currently, the article isn't supported by any reliable, secondary sources. To be considered notable for an article on Wikipedia, subjects need to to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. That usually means multiple articles, with many paragraphs devoted to the subject, run by multiple reputable publishers. Unfortunately, I looked and could only find 1 rather trivial source: GamesRadar. GamesRadar is considered a reliable source, but only 2 sentences are about Duckstation. That's just not enough. Woodroar (talk) 15:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm just adding a lot of sources and improving the page; was that enough to pass the approval? KungfuMantis (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately not. GitHub is a primary source, GoogleDocs is primary and user generated, Logic-Sunrise.com isn't reliable (as it was written by some random pseudonymous forum user), and GameTechWiki is also user generated. I suggest reading our Notability guideline in full, and also Reliable sources for the types of sources that we're looking for. We also maintain a list of reliable, situational, and unreliable game-related sources at WP:GAMESOURCES. I used our custom Google search to look for sources and, as I mentioned, only found the 1 trivial GamesRadar source linked above. Woodroar (talk) 18:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Duckstation (emulator) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duckstation (emulator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Duckstation (emulator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Woodroar (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello KungfuMantis! Your additions to Polyrhachis mucronata have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Page will be removed


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Page will be removed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. signed, 511KeV    (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, KungfuMantis,
 * What are you doing here? With page moves and page creations that make no sense. Please stop. Liz Read! Talk! 07:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Fram (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Let me explain
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aedes._sticticus I can't rename this page, so I just need your help by deleting those pages, and Ochlerotatus sticticus is not even a species and has never existed; it's just a synonym. Can you guys delete it?KungfuMantis (talk) 07:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aedes notoscriptus


A tag has been placed on Aedes notoscriptus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://wiki.pestinfo.org/wiki/Aedes_notoscriptus. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 07:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * So CC BY SA 4.0 from the source, wiki.pestinfo.org, is copyrighted? If it is copyrighted, then I will not violate the rules again, and what I need to do is fix this problem. KungfuMantis (talk) 07:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * As a wiki, it is not a reliable source in any case and shouldn't be used to base articles on. And if you copy text from a site with an acceptable license, you still need to clearly acknowledge that your text comes from there and isn't your own. Fram (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * As you've noted, CC-BY-SA 4.0 is fine (it's compatibly licensed). However, I have moved the page to Draft:Aedes notoscriptus to allow you to add better sources. Please do not use user-generated sources, and only it move it back to the mainspace when you have added reliable sources. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aedess sticticus


A tag has been placed on Aedess sticticus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 07:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aedes notoscriptus


A tag has been placed on Aedes notoscriptus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://wrbu.si.edu/vectorspecies/mosquitoes/notoscriptus and https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/59/1/67/6382597. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aedes notoscriptus


A tag has been placed on Aedes notoscriptus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://citscihub.nz/Phil_Bendle_Collection:Mosquito_(Striped)_Ochlerotatus_notoscriptus. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 07:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced moves
Hello KungfuMantis, please refrain from deleting sourced content and moving articles to former names without any discussion or providing edit summaries to justify these moves. Your changes at Geocrinia alba and Geocrinia lutea have now been reverted until you can explain why you do not consider the descriptions at ASW and AW to be correct. Loopy30 (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)