User talk:Kunsong123

October 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Tarek Najm. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Tarek Najm, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 16:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Tarek Najm. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 16:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
—Largo Plazo (talk) 17:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly removing maintenance templates and "Articles for deletion" notices from an article. It is also clear that this is one of a group of accounts that exist for the sole purpose of editing an article on behalf of the person who is the subject of the article. This puts you in conflict with Wikipedia's guidelines on conflicts of interest, and risks a conflict with Wikipedia's policies on neutral points of view and promotion. An article must be written from a neutral point of view, and people with a personal involvement with the subject of the article should normally avoid editing it. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

It seems likely that you have been editing Wikipedia in collaboration with other editors. If so, you need to be careful, because working with other editors who are only here to support controversial edits that you make could bring you into conflict with Wikipedia's policy on meatpuppetry. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2014 (UTC)