User talk:Kunwaryogendrasinghlodhikheriyarafatpur

Welcome
Dear Admin I m no more interested to share my study & research with/ on ur platform, I have so many other way to people read 'Lodhi' history which I got through reading/ researching valuable Hindu Sacred books.

But I keep my eye on this and other page u create or any body create/ write any thing unrespectable to Lodhi Kunwaryogendrasinghlodhikheriyarafatpur

Thank u for taking action on my request

I ask u to give any proof, where it is written that Lodhi is Shudra, in any of the Indian Litrature. Otherwise I have left with no option. And I mean it. U can stop me in editing wikipedia, but not stop me challengeing it in court. And I mean it. If u write Lodhi a shudra i will go with my own policy. so delete it by Today.

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Dabomb87 (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your contributed article, Lodham
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Lodham. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of Lodhi Rajputs. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of Lodhi Rajputs - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Lodhi. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''

Hi, this is the second time that I have had to revert your contributions to the article. You cannot simply remove valid, cited content that uses reliable sources and replace it with a statement that relies on primary sources. Please try not to do this again. I suggest that if you are in doubt then perhaps you raise the issue on the article talk page. Thanks.'' Sitush (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I have today twice reverted your further edits to Lodhi. Please can you discuss at Talk:Lodhi rather than warring. I have left a brief note of my reasoning there. Do much more in the way of inserting this info without discussion is likely to put you in breach of the edit warring policy or even the three revert rule, both of which could lead to you being blocked from editing. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Lodhi. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User_talk:Sitush may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * You blanked my talk page without reason. Please do not do this. - Sitush (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Lodhi
Thank u for taking action on my request

Dear wikipedia I ask u to give any proof, where it is written that Lodhi is Shudra, in any of the Indian Litrature. Otherwise I have left with no option. And I mean it. U can stop me in editing wikipedia, but not stop me challengeing it in court. And I mean it. If u write Lodhi a shudra i will go with my own policy. so delete it by Today.

Give me any written proof where Lodhi is translated as shudra, otherwise I am going to challenge u (the wikipedia and its bloody editor) in court? This is a strict warning. I mean it.

User:Kunwaryogendrasinghlodhikheriyarafatpur (talk) 12:05, 18 September 2011

You have been told on several occasions by several people, both here and via edit summary, that your contributions to Lodhi are not acceptable. They remove valid, cited information and insert details that rely on primary sources. Please, please discuss this at Talk:Lodhi. One more insertion and I shall have to report you for edit warring, which will almost certainly result in you being blocked from editing for a period. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry but I have now asked for assistance from an administrator. I cannot understand why it is that you are not prepared to countenance continued discussion of this issue in the appropriate forum of Talk:Lodhi. You cannot just go there, say "I am right" and then reinstate your version. - Sitush (talk) 06:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Dear Sitush/ Mathew	Date – 17/9/2011 I don’t know who u r? if u r Indian u must read Ved,  Purans, Sahmitas. I will give direct links. If some body running such a site/ or editing, In Indian context he must have knowledge of Ved, Purans, Sahmitas etc, or if u do not have, hire  such peoples. I have created this page way back in 2008; resume it to its earliest condition, from then only we start discussion on Topic LODHI

Regards

Yogendra Singh Lodhi

User:Kunwaryogendrasinghlodhikheriyarafatpur (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2011


 * Please see the article talk page, where I have replied to your above comment. - Sitush (talk) 06:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Lodhi. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disruptive editing at Lodhi
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Disruptive editing, as you did at Lodhi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 20:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action -- here. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  20:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)