User talk:Kurdishhistorian27

January 2021
Hello, I'm DoubleGrazing. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Kurdish dynasties and countries, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

You just need to look at wikipedia itself. Safavid dynasty was of Kurdish Origin, it stands like that in Wikipedia. Kurdishhistorian27 (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * First, Wikipedia is not a source itself (WP:NOTSOURCE). Second, although the dynasty was of Kurdish origin, no historian or specialist whatsoever (i.e. WP:RS) has ever referred to the dynasty as a Kurdish dynasty. It is generally described as an Iranian or Persian dynasty by reliable sources. If you have further concerns that are backed up by reliable sources (WP:RS) you are free to present those at the talk page of the article. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Lastly, edit-warring can get you blocked on Wikipedia, hence the warning I gave you down below. Please take your time to read Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Shoudnt this page represent dynasties which are of Kurdish Origin? Kurdishhistorian27 (talk) 13:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)