User talk:Kurdubaksi123

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tomas Mattias Löw has been reverted. Your edit here to Tomas Mattias Löw was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://goodfeetforabigman.wordpress.com/2011/01/30/review-mattias-lows-rattskiparen/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * The Indian Priest
 * added links pointing to English, Indian, Dagen and Swedish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ice Carosello


A tag has been placed on Ice Carosello, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  13:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ice Carosello, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  13:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ice Carosello ‎. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  14:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Ice Carosello while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  14:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Ice Carosello ‎. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  14:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Jamie Weinstein.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  23:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Indian Priest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Indian Priest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Indian Priest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  05:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for editing while logged out. Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Kurdubaksi123. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 20:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (The Indian Priest) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Indian Priest, Kurdubaksi123!

Wikipedia editor Kagundu just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Use inline citations for the references. See WP:REFERENCES for more info on how to go about it."

To reply, leave a comment on Kagundu's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.