User talk:Kurorohunter

JAM Project membership
Ichiro Mizuki and Rica Matsumoto are listed as "part-time members" because, unlike Eizo Sakamoto, they have not entirely ceased actions with the band. Ichiro Mizuki has worked with JAM Project after leaving, such as on STORMBRINGER, and Rica Matsumoto's message says she is just taking time off from performing to focus on her other work. Stop placing them under "Former members" with Eizo Sakamoto. If you do this, again, you may be blocked.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 07:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Nowhere are Mizuki or Matsumoto listed as "Former members of JAM Project." They are listed as "semi-regular" or "part-time." The only one who quit JAM Project is Eizo Sakamoto.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Now, no one can change that page. I have told you here, mentioned it edit summaries, and on my talk page, that Ichiro Mizuki considers himself a "part-time" member and that Rica Matsumoto has "ceased activities" but has not quit the group. The only individual who has quit the group is Eizo Sakamoto, and he no longer associates himself with it. On the Japanese Wikipedia page, Ichiro Mizuki, Ricardo Cruz, and Rica Matsumoto are listed as "semi-regular members" because they have not announced that they have permanently left JAM Project. I am being as clear about this as I can. They have to announce that they have left the group. Not consider themselves a part time member or ceased activities for the time being (ceased activities seems to only cover their current tour, as they have not released any singles without Matsumoto). Eizo Sakamoto is the only individual who says "Graduation" or he left, and he has not appeared with JAM Project since then. "Former" means "no longer associated," not "not in the group right now."— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 05:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I have been as clear as I can with you. Mizuki and Matsumoto have not permanently left the band. That is why they are not former members. Period.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 06:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Short block
Unfortunately it's not clear to me whether you and are the same person; however, both users have been making the same edit to the same page, and both have failed to discuss the change in spite of requests to do so. I've blocked this account from editing for 12 hours only, or until you indicate a willingness to discuss. Please use talk pages to resolve disputes and develop consensus, in accordance with Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. You're free to return to editing once this block expires, or to request unblocking via the unblock template, but I must ask that you agree to discuss these changes when doing either. Thank you for your time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Sourcing
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks!  krimpet ✽  04:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)