User talk:KurtFrankenberg

Hi there. I've tagged your page married put for speedy deletion as it is an essay which expresses purely an opinion and cites no references. If you wish to contest this place on the page (without deleting the  tag) and explain on the articles talk page. Keep in mind the page may have already been deleted by the time you read this. If you have any questions please drop me a note on my talk page.  •E l om i s•     08:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * To add to Elomis's comment above... my personal opinion is that "married put" could be worthy of an article, but not in its current form. I think that the three paras from "A "married put" is formed..." up until "...opens a married put position" are the best basis of an article, so I have trimmed it to that and removed the speedy deletion tag (editors other than the original author are allowed to do that). I've instead added a couple of templates requesting cleanup and categorisation; you can either do that yourself or leave it and wait for others to do so.


 * I also note that your original version contained a long extract "taken with permission from RadioActive Trading..." - it's important to be aware that such material must have a general permission under (or completely compatible with) the GFDL. If your permission holds only for your own use, only for Wikipedia's use or only for non-commercial use then it is unacceptable. (If you do have a GFDL-compatible permission, then you should email permissions (at) wikimedia.org providing proof, then mention this on the article's Talk page). Loganberry (Talk) 13:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello again. Just a little note to mention that Wikipedia article pages should never contain editors' signatures. Comments on Talk pages (such as this one!) should be signed, however. Loganberry (Talk) 00:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)