User talk:Kurtisimo4

Welcome!
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. cf38 talk  20:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS
Please don't use the United World Chart, it's not allowed. Cheers. — Realist  2  20:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Circus: Starring Britney Spears has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Rtphokie (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Lets drink  Tea  01:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Circus: Starring Britney Spears, you will be blocked from editing. MrMarmite (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

The Circus Starring: Britney Spears 'Critical Reception' section
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Percxyz (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Now look, I didn't want to have to warn you in this way, but this is now becoming a problem. Not only have you went back and added the New York Times review when it's absolutely unnecessary based on the fact that there's already 8 reviews, which is more than enough (six being positive, and two being negative), but you also have a history of removing the not-so-positive reviews regarding her show (however that was quite a while ago, so I will acknowledge that you have since then stopped.) The problem is you adding more 'good' reviews than necessary, making the section look biased. I understand you're a fan of Britney (heck, so am I) and therefore that is probably the reason you're trying to make the article look "better" by adding positive reviews/removing negative ones. However, the article needs to show an un-biased account of her tour, which includes those that are not in favour of certain aspects of her show, not just all the positive accounts. And in all reality, the article is still pretty biased anyway, considering the fact that there's six positive reviews, and only two negative ones. However the show is more of a success than it isn't, so that can pretty much slide.

I made it loud and clear on the talk page and a couple edit summaries of mine that 8 reviews are more than enough information for the Critical Reception section. Any more than that makes the section look messy, which is one of the main reasons the section was trimmed down in the first place. Six positive, descriptive, well-written reviews are enough to show Wikipedia readers that the tour is indeed going well, so there's no need to add any more (especially when added reviews only say the exact same thing as the reviews that are already up anyway.) So once again, I did not want to come at you in this manner, but I really need to make it clear that the Critical Reception section is just fine the way it is, and should not hold a biased account on the tour. And by adding more “good” reviews than bad ones, that’s exactly how it‘s going to look - biased. Percxyz (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Regarding this issue once again...
Hello again. As I'm now looking back, I feel like my warning regarding adding the New York Times reviews to the Critical Reception section was too harsh. I apologize and I am taking the warning back. A better solution to all of this would be to read WP:YESPOV. I myself have been in a situation like this before, and it's helped me understand a lot about neutral point of views, biased/un-biased information, and the like. Hopefully reading it will make things a little clearer and more understandable for you, as it has for me. And once again, sorry for bugging you like this, lol. No hard feelings. ;-) Percxyz (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BritneyRadar.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BritneyRadar.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:CherylLadd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CherylLadd.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:JaclynandCheryl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JaclynandCheryl.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Carmouche (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JaclynandCheryl.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JaclynandCheryl.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Carmouche (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:CherylLadd.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CherylLadd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Carmouche (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:BritneyRadar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BritneyRadar.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Carmouche (talk) 01:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:BritneyRadarLive.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:BritneyRadarLive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Guidelines
When talking about a television show/movie/play/video game the title should be in italics. Shorter works like songs and episodes should be in "double quotes". Additionally, when we refer to a person in an article, it's customary to use their last name and not their first. Unless you're talking about their family and using the last name would lead to confusion over which family member you're referring to. See wp:surname for more on that. Thanks, Dismas |(talk) 15:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)