User talk:Kurykh/Archive 9

USRD Newsletter - Issue 12

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 22:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey kid, happy now?
Try to be nice and not some punk kid, please. Thank you. BTW, I made you deal on the T Third article. I suggest to take it.--Inetpup 05:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Committed identity
I've seen on several userpages, including yours. I read the articles at SHA-512 and commitment scheme. What I don't understand is what purpose the committed identity serves on Wikipedia. How (and under what circumstances) can it be used to verify your identity? Thanks for your time. - SigmaEpsilon → Σ Ε 22:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: I had asked this question previously, but it was archived before you answered. - SigmaEpsilon → Σ Ε 22:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

How did a young kid like you get to be Admin?
Did you spend all your time doing this and no homework? Or did you manage to do both? Do you do Wikipedia at school on your mobile device?--Inetpup 05:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 03:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

IRC cloak request
I am Kurykh on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/Kurykh. Thanks. -- Kurykh  04:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

WP meetup
-- phoebe/ (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Images and edit summaries
I prefer the Public Domain license. But, I don't remember preferring the Creative Commons license. But, every picture I take from this point on will be on the Public Domain in Wikimedia Commons.

I have noticed the edit comments that i have been unintentionally causing headaches for other people with the  thing. I will try and remember to do that.

Goodshoped35110s 04:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

deletion of a page
i was just wondering why you deleted a page out a game called Shadow Hearts? I was trying to look up info about the game and i come to find out it has been deleted. Arroth 06:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

edit- thanks its back up now! thanks alot Arroth 07:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering why you deleted a page for a fiction character named Ellifain Tuuserail? I just found out it was deleted and I was wondering why. DaSuHouse 19:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 13

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 19:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Please Help! (When you come back from your break, of course!)
I am currently migrating images to Wikimedia Commons from the Municipal Railway page in Wikipedia. There are only 4 pictures left, and that's to curb transit foamers.

This page was created to relieve overcrowded conditions at the Muni site over at Wikipedia. If you can, please help upload pictures to commons, then placing them in the appropriate galleries. IF you can, please help. Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Goodshoped35110s 04:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Pivotlog DRV
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pivotlog. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  Jreferee  (Talk) 17:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

USRD Inactivity check and news report
Hello, Kurykh. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:
 * 1) Please update your information at WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
 * 2) There are important discussions taking place at WT:USRD relating to whether WP:USRD, WP:HWY, or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 23:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 14

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —O bot  (t • c) 01:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007


Automatically delivered by COBot 02:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

wikibooks:Transwiki:Probability derivations for making low hands in Omaha hold 'em
Hi Kurykh, you deleted Probability derivations for making low hands in Omaha hold 'em under CSD A5. AFAIK the Transwiki namespace on Wikibooks is for articles that haven't actually been fully imported, so I've restored the WP article while their folks sort that out. If I've done this wrong please let me know. Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 05:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

"No consensus"
Hello, Kurykh. I was just reading an old deletion discussion that you closed. You said the result was "no consensus", but it looked clear to me that there was consensus to keep the article. Here is the discussion. Perhaps you should take a second look at it. A.Z. 05:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

DRV Notification
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Police 911 2. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. hbdragon88 02:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:T3Smile/Anthony Chidiac
User:T3Smile/Anthony Chidiac, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:T3Smile/Anthony Chidiac and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:T3Smile/Anthony Chidiac during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 20:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

USRD inactivity notification
You have been declared inactive at USRD. If this is in error, feel free to restore yourself to the list, but only if you are truly active at USRD. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Monkey Day
Could you take another look at your close to this? It seems incorrect to delete an article with several reputable references which "cover different years and different countries and even US states" because "google search ... shows no reputable references." --Dragonfiend 18:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Your argument to overturn the AfD seems to lie solely on content issues, while an overturn is mostly only due to misinterpretation of consensus and weighing of arguments. I see no substantial reason to overturn my deletion. Hope this helps. — Kurykh  22:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks to me like you've improperly weighed the arguments. That is, it looks like you've given improperly large weight to the clearly false assertion that "google search ... shows no reputable references" and comparatively little weight to the argument that there are several reputable sources which "cover different years and different countries and even US states". Of course, I may be misunderstanding the reasoning behind your close, because I'm as yet unaware of your reasoning. You can go ahead and explain it here; I'm watching this page. --Dragonfiend 22:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I gave equal weight to the arguments. But I'm starting to get the impression that you are trying to get me to put more weight on your argument than it is due. My reasoning here, as is on most AfD's I close, is simple: "per consensus." — Kurykh  22:18, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That seems overly vague. What did you think the consensus of that AfD was? That there were no reputable sources? If so, that seems like giving improper weight to a clearly false position. Again, I may be missing something, and would welcome further detail into your decision. --Dragonfiend 22:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you are getting the mistaken impression that I am choosing one argument and using it as my basis. Instead, I take all deletion arguments and all keep arguments and weigh all of them against each other. The arguments presented were not only in black or white. There is not only a singular point of contention, but rather, there were quite a few more. — Kurykh  22:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Which specific deletion argument(s) in that AFD did you find persuasive? --Dragonfiend —Preceding comment was added at 22:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * All of them. But more people viewed that the deletion argument had more merit, hence I acted on that consensus. While AfD is not purely numbers, AfD is not purely argument. Just because a few people voice a particular argument does not negate everyone else's opinion. — Kurykh  22:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you be specific at all? Maybe quote from the AFD which specific deletion argument(s) you found persuasive? --Dragonfiend 22:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * How can I get more specific? I do not operate on only one rail. AfD closing is not a one-sided task. If you find my explanations inadequate, go to WP:DRV. — Kurykh  22:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if, for example, you thought there was merit in the nominator's suggestion that this topic was "nonnotable" with "no reputable references," then maybe you could point out how you concluded that the newspaper sources weren't reputable or that they didn't meet Notability's "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." But, again, I don't know; it was your close so I really can't tell you the specifics behind your decision making-process. I'd think you would know that better than I. So, would you like to give another try at articulating the reason(s) behind your close of that AfD? Or should I just take this to DRV? -- Dragonfiend 22:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I rest my case. You are asking me to wade into the content issue, which as the closing admin I should not do. — Kurykh  23:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm was merely asking you to explain your decision based on your view of the strengths of the arguments made and applicable policy. But since you've "rested your case" and per your suggestion, I've listed this at deletion review. Thank you. --Dragonfiend 00:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Monkey Day DRV
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Monkey Day. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dragonfiend 00:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Chidiac
Hi Kurykh, I did as you said and put up a well written stub on chidiac complete with citation, articles, etc. and it received treatment from an overzealous admin nominating it for an afd (again). Could you please add your valued comment and a "vote"? I'd appreciate your positivity to my efforts. I thought I fully complied to wiki guidelines, and I see much worse being written. I took a "train wreck" article and made a concise small stub out of it. I think the guy nominating for deletion has some negative form of association with chidiac, so is there any way more can be found out about him and if he is a real person or maybe - he is bill gates in disguise (lol). Hope you like the Anthony Chidiac stub. Thanks for your time in advance. Rgds T. --T3Smile 10:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: hangon
I know about the hangon thing.
 * Yes, I know. They tried to delete my muni-stub template at first. I tried to get rid of it, but they still wanted to delete it, so I couldn't delete it. - Go od  sh op 03:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * And one more thing: [[Image:Original Barnstar.png|thumbnail|Here's a barnstar for the 1st 2 months of your help, and that [[User talk:Goodshoped35110s/Archive 1#Reply 2|thing you were doing]]. And let's not even try disputing ever again. Just abide. - Go od  sh oped 04:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)]]

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Someone threatening suicide.
...I know, you're busy with your homework, but I just wanted to let you know, that I've been hearing that someone wanted to commit suicide per here. He's in high school, and was wondering whether you have any support for him. - Go od  sh oped 23:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC) P.S. If you're interested, It's here.
 * Oh, and did you feel that earthquake? It was a 5.6 earthquake operating x miles north-northeast of Alum Rock. - Go od  sh oped 03:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I had a feeling you wanted this
Click here for the image... Lowell High School from Eucalyptus Street, just like you said per here. Click on the link for more! Although it is kind of blocked off by a tree, I'll try to get a better shot of it next time (if possible). :) - Go od  sh oped 04:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And I just saw this when I was on my patrol. Seems like User:PWeeHurman's sockpuppet, but he has already been blocked. I also found this and this. This may be serious. I'm not sure what's your opinion, but I think you should be ready.- Go od  sh oped 02:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: AfDs
Thank you for the heads-up... I probably would have kept messing them up otherwise... and thank you even more for taking the time to clean up my trail of destruction. You can just shoot me a line and sit back if something like this happens again. :) east. 718 at 07:11, 11/5/2007

Re: Airport infobox migration plugin
Hi, I'd presume ive deleted it from that webspace as i bought my own, and stopped freeloading of my dads work space

I'll upload it tonight to my webspace for you

Reedy Boy 11:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

CBOrgatrope
Does this username ring any bells for you? He's stolen my current talk page material, and replace my signature with his, making it looks as if he's been having the discussions. He then stole your talk page archives, using a sock. After having his talk page all nice and set up, he copied pieces of various userpages, including Moe Epsilon's deleted page and HiDrNick's current. I've blocked both accounts as suspected socks, but thought you might have an idea who they belong to. - auburn pilot   talk  14:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: Zhan Li USC Survey
Hi there,

if you would like to, please can you comment on my response to concerns about my survey attempt here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Message_from_Zhan_Li_regarding_Survey

I am contacting you as you were part of the original discussion.

thank you very much Zhan Li Zhanliusc 21:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Gadgetbahn
I just noticed that page was deleted. I can't remember if I worked on that page - but I had no idea what it was, so I came to wikipedia for the answer. Its not a word I would expect to be in a dictionary. Is there any way I can view its source? I might have argued for its keep if I were notified. Fresheneesz 08:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

My coordinates
I am forbidden to speak of unspeakable things. My apologies. ··coe l acan 23:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Crystalien Conflict
In closing this AfD you have missed the sub article, Vechile matches, that was also included. Nuttah68 (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jackson
Why was Michael Jackson's child molestation charges page deleted? Sai 2020 02:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Sai 2020  10:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Response
Use my new username please. There's a reason I use my new username instead of my old one. —Kurykh 05:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, my mistake. I will comply with your request.  Thanks.--Inetpup (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Block of User:NHRHS2010isaloser
Thanks for blocking this attack account. NHRHS2010 talk  23:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

As you requested :)
I honor your request. :) Acalamari 17:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! :) Acalamari 18:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:SFMunilogo.png
Please check my userpage for the reply. And, you probably have this vandal that puts sticking that tag on your talk page, right? Well, I hope this works: Enjoy! - Go od  sh oped 22:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, there's your t-shirt. Now, I'm not sure about this, but I figured that I wanted your opinion on this, this, this, this, and this. Apparently, they are socks of PWeeHurman, who also happened to put pornographic objects on my userpage, and what he said to me. If you want, you can help by going here, because he recently stated a threat to launch 40 attacks a day by December 1st. So, if you want to help, I appreciate it. ;) - Go od  sh oped 23:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Please go here. - Go od  sh oped 04:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, he actually e-mailed me and he told me that he went "sour". If you want, I can copy the e-mail I got from him and paste it here, but Wikipedia is not e-mail hosting, so I won't bother. - Go od  sh oped 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Notice of request for deletion of editor :)
, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:R/EFD and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the editors for deletion template from the top of your userpage; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). - Go od  sh oped 01:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoa whoa whoa no offense, man! I thought you were one, that's why I said this, because I thought you were the person I was thinking you were. Anyway, no offense on the EFD. Cheers, - Go od  sh oped 01:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You need this: [[Image:SMirC-stoned.svg|left|62px]]

has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff... and help with... ... huh? - Go od  sh oped 03:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

24.25.217.126
Please block. I can't report to AIV due to continuous edit conflicts and that damn captcha thing. 74.226.48.130 (talk) 04:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * On second thought, he appears to have not edited since my fwarn. 74.226.48.130 (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Russians
Ok, if those are different people, which i doubt since today with programs anyone can change his IP, could you at least make it that only registered user could edit the page? Most of the vandals are unsigned users and it will really make the thing better. No Free Nickname Left (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)