User talk:Kurzheck

Brands Hatch
I repeat my reply that is on my talk page to be sure you get the message. The reversion was completely my mistake and I am glad you brought it to my attention. I simply read the sentence wrong, as if the past tense was the first time it appeared rather than the second - or at least in that sort of context. You were right all along. This has no effect at all on your experience with wikipedia and I am sorry for the annoyance that I caused. I have been doing quite a few edits in the last several months. Thankfully, I think I get most of them right, including about half of the ones people have questioned or complained about. But being human, I sometimes misread or misinterpret something. I will remove the message from your IP talk page, but since I assume you won't be using that, it would not matter in any event. Also, I think almost all experienced editors realize that a reversion can be a mistake or a misinterpretation by the author or the editor and that a warning or two can be mistakes as a consequence. Sorry to have spoiled your introduction and I hope you will continue to author and edit here. Donner60 (talk) 02:56, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have undone my edit rather than just change the word to make it right. That shows it was my mistake all along. Donner60 (talk) 03:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

It was my mistake for not meking my edit clear to you guys. Thanks for clearing it up. Kurzheck (talk) 03:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Your welcome and thanks for your understanding. Donner60 (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)